...A CREATOR IS A SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR WHAT EXISTS: However the proof for a creator of the universe and life CANNOT be said to be primary in nature....that is the creator himself cannot be observed. However one does not need such primary evidence to establish existence of a SUFFICIENT AND NECESSARY CAUSE. Existence can be established INDIRECTLY by observing the effects on that which can be observed in conjunction with eliminating all other reasonable alternatives for explaining given phenomena! This is called indirect evidence or secondary proof...it is a legitimate tool used in the study of LAW, FORENSICS, ANTHROPOLOGY, ARCHAEOLOGY, and COSMOLOGY. Life and the complex functional information it contains demonstrate the necessity for a designers existence as surely as an encyclopedia necessitates an author...the information in your DNA contains more information than a set of encyclopedias stretching the greater length of a football field. Such coded information and operational functionality has never been observed to be the product of an undirected process, while intelligence has historically and observationally been seen to create such information. Therefore the case for an intelligent designer is an inference to the best explanation for the phenomena of life. Footprints in the sand on a deserted beach point to a personal and intelligent presence...you need not ever have to see or produce that person to know he or she exists...all you have to know is that nature is unable to historically produce such evidence and that an intelligent presence can produce that evidence. While I cannot claim its IMPOSSIBLE for wind, rain, and sun to produce footprints that is not relevant to the discussion...we are talking about sufficient causes not impossible ones. who created the creator? youtube/watch?v=440uw540idM
Posted on: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 01:01:59 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015