[Editors note: Mike Sparks has an extensive background with - TopicsExpress



          

[Editors note: Mike Sparks has an extensive background with military and defense issues, especially related to the evaluation of prototypes of equipment for procurement. He also has a lot of integrity and imagination and has shown a willingness to pursue issues with great determination. Several commentators have suggested that demolitions were built into the Twin Towers, so I invited Mike to elaborate his reasons for believing that might be the case. The outcome is the following essay. Dennis Cimino, an electronics expert, believes that HIRF (high intensity radiated fields) would have made such a policy a risky deal due to the fact that such tall structures are effectively massive antenna systems, where radio emissions from any number of sources--including the antennae on the top--put field levels of RFs inside the structures in a realm that could trigger the detonators in these buildings had they been pre-positioned or embedded. He would really have a hard time buying the fact that bomb sniffing dogs could routinely go into these buildings but then had to be removed towards the end, due to the fact they would have been keenly aware of any compounds that could be used as demolition charges. Dennis would want to see waiver documents that allowed the buildings to have embedded pyrotechnics in them, because it would pose such a huge huge risk to the public from an accidental detonation, causing an asymmetrical collapse. But Mike observes that explosive dont go off because of electrical signals alone but need pressure and heat, safety notwithstanding. It is his position that explosives were built-in but not with their detonators attached, which has been done in South Korea in the event of war with the North. The Illuminati, of course, could care less about safety, but the bottom line is that the WTC Architect, Paul Laffoley, has asserted that they were constructed with explosives built-in. That creates a prima facie case for that being how it was done, which needs to be overcome by more powerful and convincing evidence. (read more)
Posted on: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 20:43:05 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015