*repost This is the official debriefing of the parliamentary surveillance footage. Please take notice to a few things. 1: notice when theshooter pulls up to the bollards, the bystanders quickly get in place, they all approach the vehicle, and then scatter. Why did they all get into place? The officer commenting on the video claims that they were retreating from the shooting at the memorial (which is blocks away) . So how did they run 2 blocks and beat the shooter who was driving a vehicle? And if they were aware of the shooters presence, why did they all simultaneously approach the vehicle... Also notice the strange directions they choose to run. 2: the car that the shooter commandeers is parked in front of another car. So why would the car be in reverse (car backs up approx 2) and why wouldnt the driver hit the had and try to escape instead of trusting the shooter to not kill him while stealing the car? 3: notice the police car blocking off the road when the shooter approaches the center block? 4: it was admitted by CBC that at the time the shooter approached the center block that the police were aware of the shooting. So why the slow reaction time? Watch how slowly the first police car approaches the suspects vehicle. .. Then the second car approachrs in a similar fashion, as if to allow the shooter a head start. 5: notice the reaction time of the police getting out of their vehicles once the suspect is out of the vehicle brandishing his long barrel rifle. In real time from the time the officers put their vehicles in Park to when they exit their vehicles is in between 6 and 8 seconds. I have gotten out of my car faster when i merely had to pee. So here is the official debrief given to parliamentary officials. I am showing you their version of the events to show you that, though my claims seem farfetched. The official story is far more unbelievable than my claims: -central banks using media, government, and crisis actors to develop a public opinion that would allow the passing of unconstitutional bills in Canada such as Steven blaneys bill c -44 which allows Canadians to be charged and even have their citizenship revoked based on evidence that they themselves are not allowed to see. Then in Harpers speech that i posted he explains that the next step is pre- crime detention centers. Meaning you could be held for years in a detention center without a lawyer or a court date. ..Our even a phone call. Now compare this with the 2010 G20 constitutional violations and police state Canada is not only clear but we have a documented example of what that would look like. So do your neighbor a favor and personally analyze this 3 minute video. Feel free to comment on the evidence provided. However, * any hateful or demeaning posts or comments will be deleted. Malicious site trolling will not be tolerated. Keep it intellectual, and keep it civil or your comments will be deleted immediately. Thank you -WSOGFT m.youtube/watch?v=s1H98uSBIfw&itct=CAYQpDAYCiITCPXh1aHSisICFVMuagod_G8AdzIHcmVsYXRlZEjTrqfpjsSNsbgB
Posted on: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 03:02:15 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015