1. very happy to say that after the initial statement of claim was - TopicsExpress



          

1. very happy to say that after the initial statement of claim was filed in the the Guelph ON Superior court back in the fall of 2011 (Sept. ? Oct. ?), the (formerly) Hespeler ON D.D. familys civil trial-3 million dollar lawsuit seeking damages against the Waterloo CA$ begins next week on Tuesday November 25, 2014 at the Guelph ON Superior court. There have been perhaps two weeks initially set aside for this trial. This trial is open to the public. 2. the D.D. familys case is the Child and Family Services Review Boards (CFSRB) case law having been adjudicated in ONs Court of Appeal: canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2011/2011onca441/2011onca441.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAfd2F0ZXJsb28gY2hpbGRyZW4ncyBhaWQgc29jaWV0eQAAAAAB 3. this case has been written about by the Ombudsman in one of his Annual Reports and one of our all-tyme greatest champions former Trinity-Spadina NDP MPP Rosario Marchese called out former ON Minister of CYS Laurel Broten re: the D.D. case in the OLA during question period back in May 2011: youtube/watch?v=H5xV5NzRj5o Rosario Marchese asks Minister Broten about the lack of oversight. 4. importantly fixcas has also covered the D.D. familys fight against the Waterloo CA$. below is just one of those fixcas reports: fixcas/cgi-bin/go.py?2011f.Rebecca Relief for Rebecca December 10, 2011 permalink Rebecca Davidson was taken into foster care in February 2009 by the Childrens Aid Society of the Region of Waterloo for four months. On May 20, 2011 she testified before the provincial parliament about her ordeal. Even before that testimony, her family had petitioned for relief to the Child and Family Services Review Board, where they got a favorable decision in August 2009 ordering Waterloo CAS to provide detailed written reasons to the Applicant on: 5. and lets not forget it was back on December 8, 2011 that the Supreme Court of CAN posted to its website that it was denying leave to appeal to the Waterloo CA$ re: the ON Court of Appeals judgment against Waterloo. i) canlii.org/en/ca/scc-l/doc/2011/2011canlii79179/2011canlii79179.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAAAAAAEAFjIwMTEgT05DQSA0NDEgKENhbkxJSSkAAAABADEvZW4vb24vb25jYS9kb2MvMjAxMS8yMDExb25jYTQ0MS8yMDExb25jYTQ0MS5odG1sAQ ii) scc-csc.lexum/scc-csc/news/en/item/3856/index.do Childrens Aid Society of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo v. Child and Family Services Review Board et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (34432) (The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent D.D. / La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens en faveur de l’intimée D.D.) Coram: McLachlin / Rothstein / Moldaver BOOYAKKA!
Posted on: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:51:06 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015