2410. The need to disconnect from reality, to contradict it and dismiss it as inconsequential, expresses itself in the moral and value systems which always place an emotional component to compensate for the loss of attachment to reality, and the desire to approach an objective understanding of self and the world that makes it possible. The subjective mind will always revert all to the comfortably subjective paradigm, by using human artifices, such as values, morals and idea(l)s which have no meaning outside human brains, because they are human artifices. The subjective, being a human construct, must be integrated in multifariousness where all becomes too ambiguous to be considered superior/inferior, or to exhibit any variants in subjectivity as it relates to objectivity. The objective world, though dynamic, is not so fluctuating as to be completely inapproachable. It fluctuates but still retains, in relation to human lifespans, a predictable consistency. The subjective mind must ignore this so as to return to its desirable relativity where no perspective is ever to be considered superior to another, beyond any point in space/time. The objective world must be rejected as too mysterious to be taken into account, so as to return the discussion to that of pure subjectivity, where emotion becomes a deciding factor. The indifference to human needs world is taken out of the process, leaving human subjectivity to battle it out over which offers the most comforting and love and compassion. Once this is established the dialogue becomes one of subjective emotional preferences, where some agreement can be achieved, simply because of a past/nature which is conveniently, and ironically, ignored, to make the outcome seem rational, or a result of pure, cold, logic. When discussing morals the conversation is really about ethics (encoded, social, rules), projected as some kind of universal rule (as in godly decree). The past/nature is ignored because then the source and purpose for morality must be dealt with, and then incorporated to any dialogue and any subsequent projection of an idea(l). This, too, is a form of purifying the noumenon by detaching it from the phenomenon; sanctifying it to where it can be placed on a universal, hole, pedestal.
Posted on: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:31:45 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015