A SCARY VIEW--- I have watched over the last few years the systematic “retirement” of most flag admirals and generals. I further understand that replacement senior officers are asked: “If necessary, will you shoot US Citizens?” Those that answer no are retired and those that answer yes are promoted. Next, I have watched the mass purchase of millions of rounds of ammo by the IRS, State department, homeland security, etc., why? Finally, last weekend at the El Dorado casino in Reno, there were at least a group of six homeland security people all outfitted to look like swat team. They were inside the casino. The flak vests said: “POLICE; Homeland Security”. This bothers me. Watch for all guns to be confiscated in the next few years… just as Hitler and Stalin did. Dave Sharing a Scary View-- As most reader know, FatherArt gets (unsolicited) updates, opinions, screeds and even, occasionally, a few scholarly reports from an assortment of peers, associates and colleagues from various members of the congregation. Understandably, not all of these are of the same standard of quality or authenticity as it was never my intent to impose and sense of censorship or arbitrary standards. Very often, we discuss these items privately to make some reasonable assessment of their worthiness, but it is generally understood that I will take the liberty to pass-on what I think may be of interest, entertainment, other points of views..including controversies to others that I have exchanged with via Email... And with this preface, please consider this (unfolding) view about a possible, rather scary political scenario. For obvious reasons, the name of the military source is unnamed, but I will add that I have, personally, received similar depictions from known and respected sources... As received--a**2 When I asked my colleague, the Army Colonel, why he thinks Obama is doing what he has, the reply I received from this life-long soldier and Army leader shocked me. Paraphrasing him, this is what he told me in a nutshell. He said, most branches of the service routinely engage in war “games” and come up with strategies and tactics on how to handle every type of military conflict and scenario that can be imagined. One of the big new battle scenarios being actively discussed in the military recently is how to handle civil unrest in the U.S. And fighting in the streets. What will the Army do if called in to fight armed civilians in the streets of the United States? How will that urban warfare be conducted? Will troops be able to fire upon other American citizens when the troops take an oath to protect American citizens? He said many in the military are discussing the very real possibility that Obama will attempt to stay in office beyond two terms. It is being speculated that Obama will do this by declaring a state of martial law. The easiest way to declare martial law is when there is massive civil unrest and riots throughout the U.S. Thus, it is believed that Obama, and his regime, will intentionally create a situation of massive civil unrest. Some believe he has already started to implement that strategy by forcing Obamacare on everyone (when the populace did not ask for it and less than 300 people in power voted for it). Perhaps the Obama Administration is not too concerned over the totally dysfunctional Obamacare website and the additional fact that millions will be dropped from their existing insurance policies which they already had and liked. The Obama Administration may not care if getting health care becomes more difficult and more expensive because it is all leading toward civil unrest. It is believed by some that Obamacare will only get worse and worse, and then in 2 to 3 years when people have a very difficult time getting medical treatment for themselves or their loved ones, people will get enraged. Moreover, it is being speculated that around the same time when the frustration levels over Obamacare are hitting a critical point in 2 to 3 years, there will be a “glitch” in the welfare payment (or EBT) payment system. The tens of millions who rely on EBT handouts to sustain themselves will be cut off. The overwhelming majority of the EBT recipients are Black. The Obama regime will then blame the “glitch” on the Republicans, I.e., Republicans froze government spending which “forced” Obama to suspension of EBT payments. (Obama will intentionally drive spending up and up uncontrolled knowing full well that one day the Republicans will be backed into a corner and finally vote for a freeze in spending.) Obama will create heightened racial tension by telling everyone that the White Republicans are racially motivated and did this to hurt the Black community. This manufactured racial tension, combined with growing tensions over the then-collapsing medical coverage due to Obamacare, will result in race wars and civil unrest. People will take to the streets. By the way, you should know that my colleague, the Army Colonel who is telling me all this, is Black. He specifically commented, and outwardly expressed his embarrassment, about how Blacks have become so dependent and enslaved by the welfare system and the Democrats that it would be very easy to create civil unrest and race wars merely by cutting off, or dramatically hindering, EBT payments for only a month or so. He believes that most Blacks, who have a misguided sense of entitlement, will then take to looting stores and rioting. Once the race wars, civil unrest, and violence becomes pervasive throughout the U.S., Obama will declare martial law and take over. Elections can, and will, be postponed under martial law. My colleague noted that this possibility is clearly being analyzed and discussed inside the military because such a martial law strategy is nothing new. Tyrannical and dictatorial leaders in the past have done the martial law strategy many times. He noted that dictators such as Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler did basically the identical thing. He went on to say that one of the most recent examples of this strategy was when Marcos declared martial law in the Philippines from 1972-1981 due to civil unrest. The Philippines had democratic elections up until that time. When martial law was declared, the Philippine constitution was suspended, its Congress dissolved, all elections were suspended, and Marcos remained in power for years beyond his elected term. The alleged “terrorist bombings” that occurred in the Philippines, which lead to Marcos declaring martial law, have always been questioned and never proven to be the acts of actual terrorists. He concluded by saying that many believe this is the real reason behind the purging of military generals. The older members of the military, and especially its generals and leaders, tend to be more conservative and they believe in the Constitution—and following the Constitution. Thus, a tyrant and dictator needs to get rid of these military leaders before a state of martial law is declared if the rising dictator wants the military to follow along and do what the dictator says. Due to the loss of many experienced military leaders the past few years, the military is now being run and guided more and more by younger, inexperienced leaders. The type who won’t really know what to do if martial law was declared. Moreover, he noted that there is a growing mindset throughout the military now that every soldier needs to keep quiet and just follow along with what Obama says and wants to do or you will be fired and your military career ruined. Again, I was told this is nothing new since removing strong military leaders in advance of declaring martial law is a historically-proven element of a rising tyrant and dictator. PS: For those who might be inclined to dismiss this notion out of hand...because of our Constitutional prohibition of using our Armed Forces again our own people...should pause and think about how this administration with its shared private agenda assists from the Supreme Court, DOJ, EPA, etc., at al., have been shredding it nonstop… a**2
Posted on: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 02:19:33 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015