A few quick thoughts on the controversial reversal of decision - TopicsExpress



          

A few quick thoughts on the controversial reversal of decision that powered the Green Bay Packers to a 26-21 victory over Dez Bryant and the Dallas Cowboys: The play: On fourth down with four minutes, 42 seconds remaining in the game, Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo floated a 31-yard pass down the left sideline. Bryant leaped over Packers cornerback Sam Shields and grabbed the ball with both hands. He took two steps as he stumbled to the ground. As Bryant landed just before the Packers goal line, the ball squirted loose. It made contact with the ground. Bryant then rolled over, grabbed the ball and stood up. The initial ruling: Referee Gene Steratores crew initially ruled a catch and placed the ball at the Packers 1-yard line. Packers coach Mike McCarthy challenged the play. The rule: The oft-cited process rule of the NFL rule book has surfaced many times, most famously to deny an apparent touchdown catch by the Detroit Lions Calvin Johnson in 2009. Here is what Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3, Item 1 reads: If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent), he must maintain control of the ball throughout the process of contacting the ground, whether in the field of play or the end zone. If he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control, the pass is incomplete. If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground, the pass is complete. The review: Watched in slow motion, Bryants action fits the description in the rule. He lost the ball as he stumbled to the ground. The ball touched the ground before Bryant regained control. Steratore, who was also the referee in the 2009 game involving Johnson and the Lions, reversed the initial ruling. The explanation: NFL vice president of officiating Dean Blandino tweeted shortly after the game: Bryant going to the ground. By rule he must hold onto it throughout entire process of contacting the ground. He didnt so it is incomplete. Quick thought: This play was a reminder that the eye test and the process rule are often in opposition. The NFL has tried before to rectify this discrepancy via offseason rule changes, and now its fair to assume another effort this spring.
Posted on: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:20:56 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015