A lot of people feel that I’m too harsh when I refer to our most - TopicsExpress



          

A lot of people feel that I’m too harsh when I refer to our most recent presidents as psychopaths. The problem is that many of those same people have a similar disorder. A psychopath is someone who is amoral. They are unable to love, empathize, or understand the painful results of their actions. They tend to be extremely egocentric and in the most severe cases they see no problem with killing or destroying other people’s lives. To them, it’s just another day at the office. It’s the type of person who could order a drone strike, knowing that it will kill several innocent people, and then appear on David Letterman that evening as if he’s just another loving family man. To the casual onlooker he seems like a great guy, but those who know what is going on see him for what he truly is. So think about it. Do you empathize with the innocent children we are killing? Their mothers, fathers, friends? Does it bother you at all that 70% of the casualties in the War on Terror have never harmed a soul in their life? If it doesn’t bother you, you may want to seek some psychiatric care. Don’t get me wrong, if I saw one of those ISIS pieces of crap beheading an American, or anyone else, I would hope that I would do all that I could to stop it, even if it meant putting a bullet in his empty ISIS head. I believe in the non-aggression principle and that violence is only necessary in the case of defense -- even defending a stranger. I’m a veteran soldier. If someone tries to harm you, I’ll fight for you, even if it means my death. I’m not a pacifist; I’m a non-aggressionist. I’m all about going after the guilty, arresting them, trying them, and letting a jury decide their fate, but am I willing to kill innocent kids in order to get it done? Never! Not even once! Anyone willing to support such insanity is either stupid or a psychopath. Period. As a little side note, if things were done according to natural law, the total cost of bringing the guilty to justice would be just a few million dollars and the casualties would be very few, if any. If we respected natural law, the law on which the U.S. Constitution was built, the sons and daughters of our fallen would still have their mommies and daddies in their lives. So measure the 5 trillion spent in this senseless War on Terror against the few million that it would have cost to see true justice done. Our soldiers would be alive. The innocent would be alive. Only the guilty would suffer. Instead of destroying the world, we could pool our resources and make it more peaceful and prosperous. We could feed the starving. We could cure AIDS, Cancer, and Heart Disease. We could save our loved ones. We could make this world a better place. Is the program unraveling? Is your mind breaking free from the indoctrination? Is anyone waking up?
Posted on: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 19:46:15 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015