A small circle of activities are more effective than larger ones. If, the activities are giving space to live properly. In other words, private sector jobs are more better than public sector ones, if they give stability. The task and activities, responsibility and accountability in small scale jobs are straight forward and based on clear instructions. The result of things are clear and to certain limit predictable thus can be achievable too. If some one get satisfied within the close vessel then nothing to do extra for survival; and the rest of the time can be utilised in fulfilment of desires. On other side public sector jobs are on Hugh scale. For every action of yours, there is no clear guideline and direction towards milestones. Everything is based on fuzzy assumptions and measured based on success indicator called public response. A small task of cleaning a corridor becomes hack tick when there is no clear instruction about when how and where should you work. And there is no rules for public behaviour. only and only we are solely responsible for the failure. The success is always counted as group efforts. Then life becomes slow, stressful, unwillingly and depressed; if we want to do our job better. Otherwise everything can be handled based on a single statement. "Get someone else to do the job better than me" And everyone knows, all the jobs of public sector can be performed by everyone but no one can perform it better then anyone whose giving time to job. So a big question arises in my mind, why to create a big activity circle like government in itself; rather why not create small circles of activities and providing better life at small scale activities? But question is how? Raising question is very easy but providing solution to it is difficult; and it is nearly impossible when you are explaining your solution to those who even do not like to listen the solution.
Posted on: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 13:35:53 +0000