About quantum mechanics connection through the USM kanevuniverse and is it flowing towards the general relativity? First of all congratulation to Brian about very interesting point about quantum mechanics and general relativity compatibility! First of all let me begin with this: Now let talk a little about the last episodes (there is talking about “Cosmos” series), where was explained the properties of the light and properties of the neutrino. There I have the following objection: Indeed the dark lines in the spectrum analysis of elements are result of jumping of the electrons on the electronic cloud from lower to the higher orbit and there was said that the reverse process it isn’t clear yet, which is correct in the point of view of quantum mechanics, but not according to USM kanevuniverse Again quantum mechanics give the answer about quantum action as a preservation of the phase in the diffraction wave in the different energy orbits of the atom’s electron (in concrete case hydrogen atom), which means that there the period of wave must to change whole number times to be possible the particle to be the same. This explanation despite it gives thorough quantity coincidence it isn’t essence of the quantum action. That is why the quantum mechanics can give only probability of electron jumping from higher to lower orbit. According to USM pages 85 to 98 (about atom’s energy stimulation) and pages 153 to 174 (about the nuclei’s energy stimulation) kanevuniverse the essence of the quantum action in the atoms and nuclei actually is the belated inertial reaction of the energy stimulation (see also part I and II) and the disputed dark lines in the spectrum of atoms in fact are the times which is necessary that the field reaches to the closest orbital system to communicate about the has come changing in the equilibrium of the stimulated atom. Now about well formulated by Brian problem: “the probability to find out the electron it isn’t pointed to one particular spot but several such spots, but we can measure experimentally that the electron actually is in some concrete spot, not in several spots simultaneously”…well that is the problem…isn’t it? What is the resolution and whether either the quantum mechanics is incorrect or the general relativity is incorrect? The answer is neither one nor another! Let return towards USM kanevuniverse part I pages: 8 and 9, where is given the essentially explanation of field creation and there is said that the inter movement between the objects can to be event almost segment (straight line). On the fig 4 and 5 page 11 (USM) is given the essence of electrical charge creation and you can see that the hypothetical electron (can to be the muon and other particles which use the resonance radius of electron, see further in theory), this electron there moves in some harmonic curvet line because of the inertial action and contraction with the nearest orbital systems. So we can make a conclusion: the harmonic oscillation of some particle (through which it creates its own centripetal field) can become almost straight line because there the space continuously expands or contract around this line. Here must to remind that according to USM in the universe doesn’t exist absolutely space, the spaces are only the distances between the objects and if these distances absent, there wouldn’t be orbital systems and therefore no fields no masses, simply nothing, which means there it isn’t something to be described which to shows existence of absolute space itself. Now using the conception that actually the electron’s curvet harmonic line not expand or contract the space on the balanced middle line, follows that we can find out the electron exactly there on some measurement spot, where we presumably quietly accepted that this spot is on our mind creation, called absolutely space! So if we refuse to accept the existence of absolutely space the problem disappear! G.Kanev
Posted on: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:16:51 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015