According to the international law of Europe in the late 18th century, there were only three ways that Britain could take possession of another country: • If the country was uninhabited, Britain could claim and settle that country. In this case, it could claim ownership of the land. • If the country was already inhabited, Britain could ask for permission from the Original people to use some of their land. In this case, Britain could purchase land for its own use but it could not steal the land of the Original people. • If the country was inhabited, Britain could take over the country by invasion and conquest- in other words, defeat that country in war. However, even after winning a war, Britain would have to respect the rights of Original people. Strangely Britain did not follow any of these rules in Australia. Since there were already people living in Australia, Britain could not take possession by settling this country. However from the time of Captain Cooks arrival the British Government acted as if Australia were uninhabited. So, instead of admitting that it was invading land that belonged to Original people, Britain acted as it were settling an empty land. This is what is meant by the myth of terra nullius which was challenged in Coe V Commonwealth 1979 and proven in Mabo v Queensland (No.2) 1992.
Posted on: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:14:45 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015