After Osborn, this. Then Enns in the fall. I don’t think - TopicsExpress



          

After Osborn, this. Then Enns in the fall. I don’t think I’ve ever said “I am not an inerrantist.” But the controversies which gave rise to that label were strongly conditioned by a shrunken post-enlightenment rationalism, and I would hate to perpetuate that. It’s possible that “inerrancy” is, so to speak, the right answer to the wrong question. It’s a bit like “transubstantiation” in the Middle Ages: if someone asks, “Is Jesus really present in the breaking of the bread?” you have to say “Yes,” but if the only philosophical framework you have for doing so is Aristotle’s metaphysics you will come out with an answer which sends the wrong signals.
Posted on: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 01:27:56 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015