After reading the email response from Maria Huffman of the Arizona Legislative Office of Family Advocacy, although she may be right when saying the legislators cannot intervene in a judicial proceeding, parents can use their stories to get the message to their representatives that THE PROCESS IS PRONE TO ERROR! It does not afford parents due process. 1. The burden of proof is not beyond reasonable doubt 2. Trial time limits have not been interpreted as mandatory 3. ARS says CPS is supposed to decide when its appropriate to remove a child. Well CPS asks the AG office and the AG office asks the Judge and the appointed un-elected judge rubber stamps what CPS requested for fear of being held responsible and getting his name in the paper. Which leaves a subjective and arbitrary standard for parents. Law makers must provide guidance in statutes on exactly when it is appropriate to remove a child from parents custody and provide for damages if the law is not followed. 4. Rules of criminal procedure should be followed in a contested dependency https://facebook/photo.php?fbid=739902676063108&set=pcb.739903516063024&type=1&theater
Posted on: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 23:41:59 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015