All right children, gather around. I would like to speak a teaching to you of the Father’s Glory – and personalize in such a way as should entertain you. To update you all, I did get in contact with my SSD Representative who is now reviewing my case – and I have conceded to a physical and a psychological testing as Social Security has requested – they shall even schedule it for me. Now, I did immediately try to call her back and request, as a Christian; if the matter can be handled by agencies of or associated with Catholic Charities (yeah, He let me almost get back to the couch before I got “the nudge” to remember that I am witnessing for Him First). Anyhow, answering machine. Now – to address the Pre-Amble is to play Michael reading out the charges to Lucifer’s face. Yep, and what king james had mandated in the removal of “the tyranny clause” is now restored. You see. I was found favorable in having a provable and verifyable physical condition as has altered my ability to make a living as I am able and have demonstrated in a history of an employable evidence. However, that was 2010. Now, as a Christian my Lord does exhault they which exhault Him; and part of my testimony is to present myself up in the devil’s face – let them, let all – search me freely and openly. However, in legalisims of which they have constructed their whole empire – it is as double-indemnity and worse: liken unto the IRS, in reviewing they seek to persecute for psychological (Faith; Belief; Moral) – which is a discernable no-no as such consideration was explored – AND CAME BACK VOID – in the years between my application; initial denial (during such interim, and as necessary – I was forced to try to sustain myself and further worsen my condition); and finally found favorable in 2010. (Still have to address garnishment they keep doin yet too). So children – “Play Through”. Why are you looking at me like that - you know it, and as the Lord says: now be about your business. Oh, and double indemnity yes - as I am sure when Roosevelt sold the concept with such personal attachment and in contract, it was not in the fine print or otherwise that once one is approved or found favorable, the contract could only be voided by the will of the receiver - as predicated upon the whole from our own paychecks model.
Posted on: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:57:15 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015