Another review that DELIBERATELY misses the point that wind turbine noise issues are not not about continuous dBA tones. AND deliberately avoids consideration of research that doesnt specifically involve wind turbines (or modern wind turbines, to keep moving the goal posts). The first statement of the abstracted results doesnt even make sense. Infrasound by definition is not audible! The third statement is a flat out lie. And the fourth is meaningless and meant to absolve responsibility than to direct care. With the psychosomatic hypothesis (more strongly related to individual characteristics), they are playing a cynical game of Gaslight. McCunney and Colby did the 2009 AWEA/CanWEA review. One can safely assume that their new paper is not much different from that. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25376420
Posted on: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 21:54:47 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015