Another spilt mentioned repeatedly on Twitter by reliable sources suggested that the question of who would pay for cleanup efforts -- Duke Energy or consumers -- was the real sticking point. Excerpt: ... the two chambers split over the definition of high, medium, and low priority that would attach to each of the ponds. High-priority ponds must be cleaned up right away, and 4 of the 33 ponds will be designated high priority by law. But there was no definition of lower priority and a concern among many legislators that Duke would be allowed to cap the toxic material in place near many vulnerable water sources. Read more at wral/house-passes-compromise-coal-ash-bill/13908833/#YjK0bwZz6L5oGRjW.99
Posted on: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 22:26:56 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015