Anyone following Kejriwal could easily, guess it could not be Mayawati, for his entire campaign from Youth for Equality agitation to India Against Corruption has targeted OBC and Dalit leaders, and the main grievance of this lot against Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi was the strength the subaltern leaders like Lalu, Mulayam and Mayawati derive from supporting the UPA government. Insofar as that, how is Kejriwal or Anna Hazare any different from Narendra Modi and his Sanghi comrades? Aren’t they saying the same thing and isn’t the kept media also in agreement with this perception? Anna, at least is unpretensious and made no attempt to target Modi. But Kejriwal is looking at the Muslim vote bank and therefore has suddenly decided to make a big show of fighting Modi. This appears to be a fixed fight. Modi is currently appearing invincible because all the forces opposed to Sanghi fascism from Congress to the Left to the secular regional parties once comprising the third front, have either crumbled or capitulated before the tide of the saffron brigade. The only visible obstacle is the Muslim voter, who despite Modi advocates like Shahid Siddiqui and of late Hasan Suroor, still appear focused on defeating Modi candidates, specially in UP and Bihar, notwithstanding all the fake and fraud paid surveys conducted every day on one TV channel or the other. As long as Kejriwal and Anna stuck to the script and targeted Lalu, Mulayam, Mayawati, Sonia and Rahul, he was the darling of the media, the same TV channels, Times Now, India TV, Aaj Tak et al were running every word of Kejriwal with such relish. “The Nation” wanted to know every word that Kejriwal uttered caring too hoots about its authenticity or the motive behind Kejriwal’s utterances. But the moment Kejriwal asked who was paying for Modi’s chartered planes which by any modest estimate would run into lakhs or even crores, each day, the media turned around showing how Kejriwal arrived for India Today’s conclave in a private plane as well, never mind that the plane was dispatched for him by the India Today group. Moreover, whatever Kejriwal has said about the false propaganda of Modi in relations to his tall claims of being a Vikas Purush, the Congress party has been saying all these years, but nobody believed the Congress. But Kejriwal has emerged vanquishing the Congress, so he surely must be telling the truth and even if a small percentage of fence sitters start believing what Kejriwal is saying, it is a big loss. After all in Delhi, while the AAP totally decimated the Congress party, but if it damaged Congress 70 per cent, it also spoilt BJP’s chances by 30 per cent, believes the BJP. This 30 per cent damage may mean BJP stuck under 200 and that needs countering Kejriwal on a war footing. Who better than the embedded Press? Is it not a fact that Rajat Sharma is inclined towards the BJP right from the beginning thanks to Sanghi upbringing in the ABVP? Wasn’t Deepak Chaurasia rewarded by L K Advani with a plum job in Doordarshan? Did Arnab not secure the BJP ticket for his father in the 2009 general elections from Assam? I am not saying it. Ask Bijoya Chakraverty. Is she not BJP? Is she lying? How can Arnab or Rajat then be objective newsmen or political analysts? Kejriwal and his men are right in asking why cant “The Nation” grill Modi the same way it grilled Rahul Gandhi and harangued Lalu Yadav. We all look forward to Modi being confronted with all the facts and figures about Gujarat development against his tall claims by the likes of Arnab Goswami and Rajat Sharma and not a prepaid puff job done by Prashant Mishra in Dainik Jagran. Once Modi walked out of Karan Thapar’s interview, he refused to answer embarrassing questions only recently when Vijay Trivedi confronted him and all but abandoned him midway dropping him from his helicopter, he cut short Vivian Fernandes by asking if the channels (CNN-IBN) was not paid and he made Rajdeep Sardesai sit between his feet, for an interview. Why else would the media love such a megalomaniac monster if our worthy friends were themselves not interested parties? It is simple. It is either money or political affiliations. For all we know it could be both. twocircles.net/2014mar18/media_unmasks_kejriwal_kejriwal_exposes_media.html
Posted on: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:26:10 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015