Anyone notice that “Meteorological reporting” on these - TopicsExpress



          

Anyone notice that “Meteorological reporting” on these manufactured storm systems, covers everything except meteorology? If you want a traffic report, or want to know the status of your local football field for this weekend’s game, or what department at Walmart to get a hot meal at – Meteorologists are apparently the ones to turn to. If you want to understand how a year’s worth of snow materializes in three days – I suggest you turn here. How does one, as a meteorologist, start a report by saying “A year’s worth of snow in a few days is just too much to bear,” then spend the rest of the report talking about living in Walmart and cooking up community stew – instead of explaining where that year’s worth of snow came from? How do you say “It’s incredible how this snow has fallen. Here you have six feet, go a few miles and you’ll find only a few inches,” and not explain how that is remotely possible+? Saying “Bands of snow setting up” is not meteorological reporting or explanation. Saying “and you can see that wind pattern shifting across, and we watch as that band of lake effect snow slides to the south, and then finally dissipates.“ is not meteorological reporting or explanation. Saying “Pavement is actually available there,” is not meteorological reporting or explanation. Saying “On a 100x150 foot roof, we could be talking a million pounds of snow” is not meteorological reporting or explanation – of where a million pounds of snow per roof came from in three days. These misdirection specialists are becoming too painfully obvious to even watch… and I’m very curious who is spoon-feeding them these tidbits of anti-information to parrot to the general public. For me however, It was also another long weekend spent on rendering, so during yesterday’s 15 hour run making this video (which was attempt number two after the first one failed), I went outside for a bit. The first thing I noticed, was that the refrigerated cold was over. I had checked the temperature before heading out (51 degrees), but it felt warmer than that. Almost no one had gloves on, and some people didn’t even have jackets on. Then I got to a stretch of sunlight, and it was warmer still. Just as I was wondering how long they would let the air warm up like this (because it is such tremendous effort to get it cold in the first place – or again), I looked up between the buildings and saw a big fat chemtrail in the clear blue sky, already starting to widen. In the span of five minutes, I saw another… then another… then another… then a sheet of chemcloud cover that looked like a plate started to slide in from another direction… then you could see layers of it hit with Nexrad Frequency… then before you know it, is was starting to haze up and block the sun. Clearly, I’m quite in touch with the impetus and process at this point. Not a second goes by that I am not immensely grateful for my ever-evolving awareness of reality… on all levels for that matter. (Full message continued in Post Comment) WW101 weatherwar101/ Please support this continuing independent work. tinyurl/WW101-PP If you want to understand what they obviously don’t want anyone to understand, you can do it in 40 pages. No Natural Weather: Introduction to Geoengineering 101 tinyurl/NNW-101 --- No Natural Weather: eBook Obstruction and Disinformation ow.ly/xPHEK Introduction to Geoengineering 101 ow.ly/utaM4 The Big Picture 2.0 ow.ly/uxzEE --- FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
Posted on: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:04:50 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015