Anytime that a hard-nosed analysis is put forth of who our rulers are, of how their political and economic interests interlock, it is invariably denounced by Establishment liberals and conservatives (and even by many libertarians) as a conspiracy theory of history, paranoid, economic determinist, and even Marxist. These smear labels are applied across the board, even though such realistic analyses can be, and have been, made from any and all parts of the economic spectrum, from the John Birch Society to the Communist Party. The most common label is conspiracy theorist, almost always leveled as a hostile epithet rather than adopted by the conspiracy theorist himself. It is no wonder that usually these realistic analyses are spelled out by various extremists who are outside the Establishment consensus. - Murray N Rothbard (1977)
Posted on: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:39:30 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015