Appearing for Srinivasan, senior advocate Kapil Sibal had challenged petitioner CAB and its secretary Aditya Verma to give a single instance where Srinivasan had acted in conflict of interest and caused loss to the board while favouring himself or his team. The bench had pointed to a decision by the IPL governing council, whose meeting was attended by Srinivasan, to compensate Rs 13 crore to CSK for an abandoned Champions League match. How could you have decided your case? The fact that the money was returned by CSK made no difference to the conflict of interest on your part when the decision was taken, the bench had said.
Posted on: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:20:54 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015