As promised, here is todays installment of the nonsense that some scientists are expecting the public to swallow in a bid to prop the stillborn idea of Darwinism... ----------- 1. A critical analysis of the available lead data shows ages obtained which extend millions of years into the future! (R. Matthews, Ex Nihilo. Queensland, Australia, vol.5, no.1, 1982, p.41) According to isotopic ratios for common lead found in rocks, many of our rocks should not exist, but will only come into being far into the future. (Faul, Nuclear Geology. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1954; Ages of Rocks, Planets and Stars. McGraw-Hill, 1966. R. Russel and R. Farquhar, Lead Isotopes in Geology. New York: Interscience Publishing, 1960) Geologists discard such date results. Perhaps it is the method that should be discarded? 2. The same piece of basalt rock from Nigeria gave ages (by different methods) from 2 to 750 million years. (Nature Physical Science, vol. 232, 19 July, 1971, pp.60-61) 3. In eight separate tests, scientists dated samples of rock – and arrived at ages of 160 million to 3 billion years. These specimens, from Kaupelehu, Hualalai Volcano, Hawaii, were later found to have formed in a lava flow only 168 years earlier, in 1801. (Science, vol.162, p.265. Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 73, p.4601. American Journal of Science, vol. 262, p.154) 4. Rock samples from twelve volcanoes in Russia and ten samples from other parts of the world (all known to be less than 200 years old), gave ages by the uranium-thorium-to lead method varying from millions to billions of years. (Duane T. Gish, “Dating of the Moon Rocks”, Creation Science Report, vol. 1, No. 2, March-April, 1972) [The Big Dating Blunder, J. Gray, PhD. p. 11] ---------- In ALL my reading on this topic since the early 1990s, this was my FIRST time to come across a so-called scientific date reading that placed the age of a presently existing rock in the FAR future. #SMH... I have NO qualms with SCIENCE (the HONEST study of the natural, physical world). I have qualms with DISHONEST scientists.
Posted on: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:34:25 +0000