At the very same time that America refused to give the Negro any land, through an act of Congress our government was giving away millions of acres of land in the West and the Midwest, which meant it was willing to undergird its white peasants from Europe with an economic floor. But not only did they give them land, they built land grant colleges with government money to teach them how to farm. Not only that, they provided county agents to further their expertise in farming. Not only that, they provided low interest rates in order that they could mechanize their farms. Not only that, today many of these people are receiving millions of dollars in federal subsidies not to farm, and they are the very people telling the black man that he ought to lift himself by his own bootstraps. And this is what we are faced with, and this is the reality. Now, when we come to Washington in this campaign, we are coming to get our check. Martin Luther King Jr. 1968 Every year its the same propaganda that has nothing to do with Dr. Kings work or legacy. All you know is the I have a dream speech(which was not the real title) and most really have never listened to the whole speech. So called transcripts of the speech is edited, with lines removed. Given a sanitized version. They purposely repeatedly play the same excerpts of the last 3 mins of that speech. A dream is something you have when you are sleep. MLK was not about a dream, when you study him, he was about the American nightmare. The goal of the civil rights movement was desegregation not intergration. MLKs philosophy was not one of color blindness. He supported black economics, the black power movement He wrote 5 books that no one knows about or read, they clearly show who he was and the evolution of his mindset and policies. He was a pan-Africanist He was not dealing with civil rights after 1965 America is the greatest terrorist group in the world. Dr. King Calling him a civil rights leader misrepresents Dr. King. He was a political activist. He was hated in 67-68. Supported violent revolutions in Africa and Asia. They gave him a peace prize, but he was never apart of the peace movement. King was unsure if non-violence could solve the problem. Martin Luther King Jr. was not some non-violent symbolic dreamer.
Posted on: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:50:38 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015