Atheists at the Creation Museum youtu.be/xVHWq0ZGE_Y Excerpt: On October 5th, 2012, Seth Andrews joined a group of skeptics for a tour of Kentuckys infamous Creation Museum. These are the Top Ten Lessons he took away from that experience. This article was published in December 2014. It represents some of what the group that toured the Creation Museum does not know. The host metabolite D-serine contributes to bacterial niche specificity through gene selection dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.242 This article takes everything evolutionary theorists were taught to believe about mutations and evolution in E. coli, and replaces it with what serious scientists understand about amino acid substitutions and cell type differentiation in all cells of all individuals of all species. Cell type differentiation is biophysically constrained by the chemistry of protein folding. Feedback loops link nutrient uptake to the physiology of reproduction via RNA-mediated events that link the epigenetic landscape to the physical landscape of DNA in the organized genomes of species from microbes to man via chromatin loops. That is what scientists know. This video representation suggests that what the people who visited the Creation Museum think is science is actually the pseudoscientific nonsense taught to them by others who are equally uniformed about what is known to serious scientists, which is that Life is physics and chemistry and communication dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12570 If you visit any museum of Natural History, try to think in terms of what serious scientists must integrate before validating their theories with experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect. If you cant find anything that appears to link the laws of physics to the chemistry of protein folding, youre more likely to find support for mutation-driven evolution, despite the fact that no experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect suggests mutation-driven evolution is possible. In the words of science journalist, Carl Zimmer, mutation-driven evolutoin just happens. scientificamerican/article/the-surprising-origins-of-evolutionary-complexity/ The Surprising Origins of Evolutionary Complexity Others maintain that as random mutations arise, complexity emerges as a side effect, even without natural selection to help it along. Complexity, they say, is not purely the result of millions of years of fine-tuning through natural selection—the process that Richard Dawkins famously dubbed “the blind watchmaker.” To some extent, it just happens.
Posted on: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:52:04 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015