August 8, 2014 in Region Psychiatric boarding illegal, court - TopicsExpress



          

August 8, 2014 in Region Psychiatric boarding illegal, court rules Justices side with patients held in hospitals Nicholas K. Geranios Associated Press Case background The state’s involuntary treatment act was enacted in 1979, and the state’s mental health system almost immediately was overwhelmed by patients. In early 2013, 10 people were involuntarily detained in Pierce County, mostly in emergency rooms and hospitals. In all 10 cases, the county sought to hold the people for up to 14 days. Several of the patients moved to dismiss the 14-day petitions on the grounds they were not in certified evaluation and treatment facilities. People with suspected mental health problems cannot be “warehoused” in emergency rooms and hospitals when certified mental health facilities already are full, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday. The court unanimously upheld a ruling by a Pierce County judge. The state’s involuntary treatment act allows counties to briefly detain people suspected of having mental problems who present an imminent risk of harm to themselves or others, or are gravely disabled. The detention is for the purpose of evaluating, stabilizing and treating the disorder. However, Pierce County frequently lacked enough space in certified evaluation and treatment facilities, and regularly resorted to temporarily placing those it detained in emergency rooms and hospitals, where they received little or no treatment. That is a practice known as “psychiatric boarding.” Ten people who were involuntarily detained challenged the practice, and the trial judge found psychiatric boarding was unlawful. Upon appeal, the Supreme Court agreed. “Patients may not be warehoused without treatment,” the high court ruled. Rather, patients have a right to adequate care and individualized treatment, the court said. And state law required they be detained in certified evaluation and treatment facilities. “This definition does not include hospital emergency rooms or acute care centers unless they are specifically certified,” the Supreme Court said. The state Department of Social and Health Services said the decision means people with mental illness could end up on the streets instead of in hospitals. “DSHS, as always, respects the authority of the courts, but we are very concerned for the people in need and for the community,” said Victoria Roberts, the agency’s deputy director. The department has proposed allowing local governments to increase local option taxes to support community mental health funding. It also wants to add capacity at the state mental hospitals to meet the demands for court-ordered competency evaluations, Roberts said. But Scott Bond, president of the Washington State Hospital Association, said the ruling was a good one for hospitals and patients. “Patients who are in psychiatric crisis need to be seen in safe and comfortable environments, and should not have to wait indefinitely,” Bond said. “We are looking forward to working with the state and others to reform the system and secure the funding that will help ensure that patients get the care they need.” During a February 2013 hearing before a mental health commissioner, witnesses testified that patients held in hospitals generally received little or no mental health care. A witness also said the use of hospitals to house the mentally ill had exploded in recent years and was continuing to increase. The commissioner found that the psychiatric boarding was unlawful. Pierce County and the state health services agency challenged that finding, saying psychiatric boarding was allowed to avoid overcrowding certified facilities. But a Pierce County judge ruled that such boarding in hospitals was illegal.
Posted on: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 19:08:47 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015