Bbc at it again: Who knew huh? Did enjoy Today’s Jihadi Radio….makes you wonder why we need a separate ‘Asian Network’ when the BBC as a whole pumps out a certain narrative…and now we hear that not only are MI5 evil torturers of innocent men they are too incompetent to catch such innocent men should they not be so innocent…however the lawyer representing them was asked at least one difficult question….is there any proof that what they say is true? His reply …after a long pause…er well…another person says the same thing. Case closed then. Also like the BBC website’s take on MI5… MI5 ‘set for criticism’ over Lee Rigby murder Newsnight’s investigations correspondent Nick Hopkins said: “I think it is pretty clear this report will clear MI5 of having intelligence that could have prevented Lee Rigby’s death. “But there is a significant issue here, which is should MI5 have given greater priority and greater scrutiny to these two men in the run up to Lee Rigby’s death?” The findings show that MI5 had at one stage tried to recruit one of Lee Rigby’s killers because of his “familiarity with jihadi circles”, he told BBC Newsnight. A bit of a non-sequitur there….MI5 could not have prevented the death of Lee Rigby…but in the next paragraph the BBC declares essentially that they could have if only they had given the pair more scrutiny. The Telegraph explains why MI5 struggles to cope…an entirely different take on things and a more indepth look at why MI5 cannot know everything about everybody… Only a fraction of terror suspects can be watched 24/7 Limitations in watching suspects revealed as report into killing of Lee Rigby is expected to say it is virtually impossible to prevent ‘lone-wolf’ killings MI5 can monitor fewer than 50 terrorist suspects around the clock, it can be disclosed, ahead of a report into the Lee Rigby murder that will highlight the limitations in watching terrorists in Britain. Restricted resources mean only a fraction of the hundreds of suspected Islamist extremists at large can be subject to intensive 24/7 surveillance at any one time. The committee is understood to have accepted that neither man was assessed as a serious enough risk to have legally justified more intensive surveillance which may have found those clues. The pair were only peripheral figures among the hundreds of extremists whom the intelligence agencies must monitor with limited resources. Prof Peter Neumann, an expert on terrorism from King’s College, London, told Sky News that the security services had to make a judgment about who to keep under surveillance. “If you assume that at any given point there are 500 or 600 potentially violent extremists in the country and that it takes 20, 25 people to keep somebody under surveillance 24/7, inevitably given that resources are limited you can only watch maybe 50, 60 people at any given time 24/7. Perhaps the BBC’s friends at the Guardian might like to also add to the explanation as to why tracking terrorists may now be even harder……. Edward Snowden leaks mean GCHQ takes three times as long to track terrorists Intel Heads: Edward Snowden Did ‘Profound Damage’ to U.S. Security
Posted on: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:04:35 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015