But who created God? is an invalid and tedious argument. It is logically impossible for the cause of time to be dependent upon time. Thus, the primary cause was always there (or it never was). Due to the level of fine tuning of the universe, which is orders of magnitude greater than any human engineering achievement, the cause of the universe must be an agent which is not restricted by the laws of nature (the cause is above nature) and it is indirectly responsible for the applications of science and logic. Due to the algorithmic complexity present within every single cell of every living system (and due to the fact that the digital information therein is not reducible to nature), it can be inferred that the primary cause is a personal being which is potentially unbounded in power. When the atheist\naturalist appeals to science or logic (formal disciples which are indirectly the result of the Creator and only possible due the uniformity in nature - evidently the Creator upholds the universe in a consistent manner) in an attempt to refute the existence of the Creator (or assumes that natural processes can explain the origin of natural processes), they demonstrate short-sighted irrational behavior which is not consistent with logic or science. It is outside the realm of science to disprove the reality of a Creator and it certainly isnt based on logic. Thus, atheism is merely a metaphysical naturalist philosophy.
Posted on: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 23:01:21 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015