COMMENTS FROM NGO EX-SERVICEMEN, CHENNAI 1. EX GNR M NAGA RAJAN BEARING No 14467480L DISCHARGE FROM SERVICE ON MEDICAL GROUNDS HIS DISABILITY WAS NEUROSIS. HE ENROLLED IN THE ARMY IN SOUND HEALTH. HIS DISABILITY ORIGINATED DURING ACTIVE SERVICE. AS PER ENTITLEMENT RULES AND GUIDE TO MILITARY OFFICER (MILITARY PENSION) AND CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES IN THE PENSION REGULATIONS FOR THE ARMY 1961 PART 1 ANNEXURE II TO APPENDIX III THE DISEASE PSYCHOSIS IS DESCRIBED AS THE DISEASE AFFECTED BY STRESS AND STRAIN OF MILITARY SERVICE AND AS PER MEDICAL DICTIONARY THE DISEASE PSYCHOSISIS IS CONSIDERED AS NEUROSIS. THE INVALIDING MEDICAL BOARD HAS CONSIDERED IS DISABILITY AS 30% AND NOT ATTRIBUTABLE TO MILITARY SERVICE. THE MEDICAL BOARD ALSO ENDROSED IN HIS MEDICAL BOARD OPINION THAT THE INDIVIDUAL COMPLAINING ABOUT HIS INJURY WHILE DOING BATTLE PHYSICAL EFFICENCY TEST (BPET) AND FALL DOWN WHILE JUMPING HURDLES THAT IS GHODA JUMP AND GOT INJURY IN NECK. THIS POINT HAS BEEN IGNORIED BY THE MEDICAL BOARD WHILE CONSIDERING HIS ACTIVITY. AS PER MEDICAL HISTORY THE DISEASE AROSE DURING SERVICE LEADING DETERIORATION IN HIS HEALTH WHICH CULMINATED INTO HIS DISCHARGE FROM SERVICE. HE WAS ENTITLED FOR MEDICAL PENSION BUT REJECTED TILL DATE. 2. EX GNR M NAGA RAJAN APPROACHED AFT CHENNAI BENCH FOR JUSTICE VIDE O.A No 19/2012. AFT CHENNAI BENCH SHOWED ITS INABILITY TO INTERFARE IN MEDICAL BOARDS OPINION BY GIVING REFRENCE TO A.V DAMODARANS CASE. HOWEVER THE HONORABLE COURT DIRECTED THE INDIVIDUAL TO CHALLANGE OPINION OF MEDICAL BOARD IN REVIEW MEDICAL BOARD. HE WAS CALLED FOR REVIEW MEDICAL BOARD AT MH CHENNAI. THE MEDICAL BOARD WITH EGO AND SHOE MOTED DECLARED IS DISABILITY AS NILL. 3. EX GNR M NAGA RAJAN AGAIN APPROACHED HONORABLE AFT FOR JUSTICE THROUGH HIS PAID LEGAL COUNSEL. HIS PAID LEGAL COUNSEL PAYMENT OF FEES AND COMPLICATED HIS CASE WHICH COMPELLED HIM TO WITHDRAW HIS VAKALAT FROM HIM VIDE HIS PETITION DATED 04 MAR 2013. THAN THE NEXT ASSISTANCE VOLUNTARILY TOOK THE CASE IN HIS CHARGE TO COMPLETE ITAND NECESSARY FEES PAID TO THE ADVOCATE BANK TRANSFER BUT TILL DATE FROM 04 MAR 2013 HIS CASE NOT PROJECTED IN AFT. THIS IS THE REAL FACT OF A POOR EX-SERVICEMEN TO FACE SO MANY OBSTACLE FOR JUSTICE WHO HAS NO INCOME OR PROPERTY TO ARRANGE FOR EDUCATION/MARRIAGE OF HIS TWO YOUNG DAUGHTERS. 4. AFT CHENNAI BENCH HAS NOT YET DISPOSED OFF HIS CASE IT STILL LIES IN THEIR COURT BECAUSE NO FURTHER INTIMATION RECEIVED FROM HIS COUNSEL OR HONORABLE AFT CHENNAI BENCH.
Posted on: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:18:31 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015