CTVNews.ca Staff Published Friday, January 10, 2014 7:57AM EST Last Updated Friday, January 10, 2014 2:44PM EST In a controversy thats attracted the attention of some top politicians, Torontos York University is defending its policies after the administration came down on the side of a male student who didnt want to do group work with his female classmates. A deciding factor in this case was that it was an online course where another student had previously been given permission to complete the course requirement off-campus, universitys vice-president academic Rhonda Lenton said in a statement issued Thursday. Ultimately, a satisfactory agreement was reached between the professor and the student. The controversy stems from an unnamed students request, citing unspecified religious grounds, that sociology professor Paul Grayson excuse him from the group project thats part of the otherwise online course. Grayson originally rejected the request, and the student participated in the group work as scheduled. But the dean of York Universitys faculty of arts later weighed in, telling Grayson that, because the students request would not have a substantial impact on the rest of the class, it should have been accommodated. But Grayson disagrees. I thought the university should have a principled stance on this kind of occurrence,” he said in an interview with Toronto radio station Newstalk 1010 on Thursday. Ive repeatedly said if we allow this kind of exclusion, we also have to allow the exclusion of Jews, blacks, gays and so on if there is a religious belief backing up a request for accommodation. As the story made headlines across Canada, the professors standpoint found some high-level support. “It is Canada’s uncompromising commitment to gender equity and inclusivity which makes us proud to call ourselves Canadian, Justice Minister Peter MacKay said in a statement to CTV News. As I’ve said, we did not send soldiers to Afghanistan to protect the rights of women to only see those same rights eroded here at home. Canada is internationally recognized as being one of the most diverse and peaceful nations in the world. Canadians expect that post-secondary institutions will always respect such fundamental principles as equal participation in society for women.” In his own remarks, Opposition Leader Thomas Mulcair told CTV News he sided with the professor. The professor made the right call. In terms of reasonable accommodation, this specific demand is not at all reasonable and, therefore, should not be accommodated, he said. In her written statement, Yorks Lenton noted that the, Taylor‐Bouchard Commission of 2007‐8 recommended accommodation as a guiding principle, recognizing that the duty to accommodate is not limitless. Such limits include circumstances, she added, where accommodation infringes on the rights of other individuals or compromises the academic integrity of a course. While the university welcomes the public debate now focused on the issues raised by this case, employment lawyer Natalie MacDonald says, in her view, the students request was inherently discriminatory. Really, what the gentleman was asking for was to not be in a room with women, MacDonald told CTVs Canada AM Friday. and of course that unto itself was discriminatory in the sense it marginalizes women... And this type of situation is not what happens in Canada, nor should it. With files from The Canadian Press ctvnews.ca/canada/mackay-mulcair-voice-criticism-of-york-u-s-religious-accommodation-1.1633063
Posted on: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:33:22 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015