Came across this story while researching a couple things before responding to a gun rights post made my a friend. Is the NRA really promoting a universal right to bear arms? And if so, doesnt that mean terrorists too, particularly since the arguments being used are that it is a necessary defense against tyranny? The problem with that is the tendency of some to define tyranny rather loosely, especially in tougher economic times.... nytimes/2006/09/17/magazine/17wwln_essay.html?_r=0
Posted on: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:07:46 +0000