Cant upload more than one video at a time anyway. Makes sense but its still inconvenient. Also I worry for every second I spend in the fb app Thanks to e and Luke for pointing that out. Also this is the only wAy to ensues optimal quality. Anyway there is more to come but Ive got a kitteh to feed and care for ( often times •care for• is a codeword scooping poop or otherwise attending to vowels eg managed care, or bowels. Either way. Its not a cure.) Also Ive got some good stuff rocking around in my brain. I think the world is gonna like it. Replication machines would be awesome. Not psychological experiment replications; those are a waste of time since there is no theory in which they are embedded to validate the force of their argument. And thats not to say that there are not tonnes of problems causing lots of context sensitive positive results. The issue is not whether something replicates some information or procedure of producing information but whether that information matters. Thats why object replication is awesome because its scope is actually fairly limited. It is a scientific enterprise of the particular, that can be known to be more or less successful at exactly reproducing books to my very own eyes. You can trust those eyes or not but if theyre off Ill definitely annotate a copy with all the issues Ive found or others gave found and release that as well replicated as I could given that day’s technology, so as to replicate the old replication problems, but also recording the original object(which hopefully is mostly unchanged) to compare all four copies to one another to figure out the differential bias of the new process thereby allowing us to identify the bias that this new process imparts as well as figuring out some of the bias from the original recording using the diffs between the different conditions. I think you can get at least those two statistics of the particular since you have with the day measured at time t • original(t) • copy(original(t_record_1),(t_print_1,t] ) =: copy_1(t) • copy(original(t_record_2),(t_print_2,t] ) =: copy_2(t) • copy(copy_1(t_record_1_1),(t_print_1_,t] ) =: copy_1_1(t) And yes that was an attempt at interval notation, what do you think? Regardless this scheme for replication is far more interesting than any of the replications that are getting the most attention. Probably far more relevant to the rest of the world. But Im not pointing fingers :p :D Cheers, :€
Posted on: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 05:08:02 +0000