Chief Minister of Gujarat Mr. Modi political success path First Term (2001-2002) Patels failing health, allegations of abuse of power, corruption and poor administration, as well as a loss of BJP seats in by-elections, prompted the BJPs national leadership to seek a new candidate for the office of chief minister. Patels position was also damaged by the devastating Bhuj Earthquake of 2001, the effects of which his administration struggled to handle.[23][25][26] Modi, who had aired his misgivings about Patels administration, was chosen as a replacement.[16] L. K. Advani, a senior leader of the BJP, however, did not want to ostracise Patel and was worried about Modis lack of experience in governance. It was suggested that Modi should be made the deputy chief minister in a government led by Patel, upon which Modi informed Advani and Atal Bihari Vajpayee that he was going to be fully responsible for Gujarat or not at all and declined the proposal. On 7 October 2001, Modi was appointed the Chief Minister of Gujarat and was assigned the responsibility to prepare the BJP for elections in December 2002. As Chief Minister, Modis ideas of governance revolved around privatisation and small government, which stood at odds with what Aditi Phadnis has described as the anti-privatisation, anti-globalisation position of the RSS.[25] 2002 Gujarat violence Main article: 2002 Gujarat violence On 27 February 2002, a train with several hundred passengers including large numbers of Hindu pilgrims was burned near Godhra, killing around 60 people.[a] Following rumors that this was arson carried out by a Muslim mob, there was widespread anti-Muslim violence throughout Gujarat.[29] Estimates of the death toll in that subsequent violence range from 900 to over 2,000; several thousand more were injured.[30][31] The Gujarat administration was accused by human rights organizations, the opposition, and sections of the media of taking insufficient action against the violence, and condoning it in some cases.[32][33][34] The Modi government imposed a curfew in major cities, issued shoot-at-sight orders, and called for the army to prevent the violence from escalating.[33][34] In April 2009, the Supreme Court of India appointed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to inquire into the Gujarat government and Narendra Modis role in the incidents of communal violence.[32] The SIT reported to the court in December 2010 submitting that they did not find any incriminating evidence against Modi of willfully allowing communal violence in the state.[35] Modis decision to move the corpses of the kar sevaks who had been burned to death in Godhra to Ahmedabad has also been criticized for inflaming the violence.[36][37] However, the SIT found his decision to be justified.[citation needed] In April 2012, the SIT absolved Modi of any involvement in the Gulbarg Society massacre, one of the many riots that occurred in 2002.[38][39] On 7 May 2012, the Supreme Court-appointed amicus curiae, Raju Ramachandran, observed that Modi could be prosecuted for promoting enmity among different groups during the 2002 Gujarat violence. His main contention was that the evidence should be examined by a court of law because the SIT was required to investigate but not to judge.[40] The amicus report has been criticised by the Special Investigation Team for relying heavily on the testimony of Sanjiv Bhatt.[41] In July 2013, it was alleged that the SIT was suppressing evidence.[42] 2002 election Main article: Gujarat legislative assembly election, 2002 In the aftermath of the violence, there were calls for Modi to resign from his position as chief minister of Gujarat. The opposition parties stalled the national parliament over the issue. Both the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), allies of the BJP, also asked for Modis resignation, as did Jayalalithaa, the then-Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu and leader of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK).[43][44] Modi submitted his resignation and the state Assembly was dissolved.[45] In the subsequent elections the BJP, led by Modi, won 127 seats in the 182-member assembly.[46] Modi used extreme anti-Muslim rhetoric during the campaign.[47][48][49] Second term (2002–2007) During his second term, Modis emphasis shifted from Hindutva to the economic development of Gujarat.[25] Modis decisions curtailed the influence of organizations of the Sangh Parivar such as the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh (BKS) and the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP),[50] which had become entrenched in Gujarat after the decline of Ahmedabads textile industry.[25] Modi dropped Gordhan Zadaphia, an ally of his former Sangh co–worker and VHP state chief Praveen Togadia, from the cabinet ministry. When the BKS launched a farmers agitation, Modi ordered their eviction from houses provided by the state government.[50] Modis decision to demolish 200 illegal temples in Gandhinagar deepened the rift with VHP.[50][51] Various organisations of the Sangh were no longer consulted or apprised of Modis administrative decisions prior to enactment.[50] The changes brought by Modi in the period 2002–2007 has led to Gujarat being called an attractive investment destination. Aditi Phadnis, author of Political Profiles of Cabals & Kings and columnist in the Business Standard, writes that there was sufficient anecdotal evidence pointing to the fact that corruption had gone down significantly in the state... if there was to be any corruption, Modi had to know about it.[25] Modi instituted financial and technology parks in the state. During the 2007 Vibrant Gujarat summit, real estate investment deals worth INR6.6 trillion were signed in Gujarat.[25] Atal Bihari Vajpayee, then Prime Minister of India, who had asked Modi not to discriminate between citizens in the aftermath of the 2002 Gujarat violence and had pushed for his resignation as Chief Minister of Gujarat,[52][53] distanced himself from Modi and reached out to North Indian Muslims before the 2004 elections to the Lok Sabha. After the elections, Vajpayee held the violence in Gujarat as one of the reasons for BJPs electoral defeat and acknowledged that not removing Modi immediately after the Gujarat violence was a mistake.[54][55] Terrorism and elections in 2007–2008 Further information: Gujarat legislative assembly election, 2007 In the lead up to assembly and general elections in 2007–2008, the BJP stepped up its rhetoric on terrorism.[56] On 18 July 2006, Modi criticised the Indian Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, ... for his reluctance to revive anti-terror legislations such as the Prevention of Terrorist Activities Act. He asked the national government to allow states to invoke tougher laws in the wake of the 2006 blasts in Mumbai.[57] Around this time Modi frequently demanded the execution of Afzal Guru,[58] a collaborator of the Pakistani jihadists who had been convicted of terrorism for his involvement in the 2001 Indian Parliament attack.[59][b] Modi had completed 2,063 consecutive days as chief minister of Gujarat in July 2007, making him the longest-serving holder of that post.[60] The BJP won the 2007 election, gaining 122 of the 182 seats in the state assembly, and Modi continued in office as chief minister.[61] As a consequence of the November 2008 Mumbai attacks, Modi held a meeting to discuss security of Gujarats 1,600 km (990 mi) long coastline which resulted in the central government authorising construction of 30 high–speed surveillance boats.[62] Third term (2007–2012) The Sardar Sarovar Dam, undergoing a height increase in 2006. Modis Government has focused on clean energy sources for meeting the energy requirements of the state, such as hydroelectric power (pictured above) and solar energy in addition to biofuels and wind energy.[63] Gujarat is a semi-arid state and, according to Tushaar Shah, was ... never known for agrarian dynamism but in recent years[when?] has improved its agricultural output substantially, in large part due to projects relating to improvement of groundwater supplies in Saurashtra, Kachchh and the north, as well as efforts to increase the use of micro-irrigation and to provide more efficient power supply to farms. Public irrigation measures in the central and southern areas, such as the Sardar Sarovar Project, have not been so successful in achieving their aims.[64] Development projects Successive BJP governments under Patel and Modi supported NGOs and communities in the creation of infrastructure projects for conservation of groundwater. By December 2008, 500,000 structures had been constructed, of which 113,738 were check dams. While most check dams remained empty during the pre-monsoon season, they helped recharge the aquifers that lie beneath them.[64] 60 of the 112 Tehsils which were found to have over–exploited the groundwater table in 2004 had regained their normal groundwater level by 2010[65] and Gujarat had managed to increase its groundwater levels at a time when they were falling in all other Indian states. As a result, production of genetically-modified Bt cotton, which could now be irrigated using tube wells, increased to become the largest in India.[64] The boom in cotton production and utilization of semi–arid land[66] saw the agriculture growth rate of Gujarat increase to 9.6% in the period 2001–2007.[67] For the decade 2001–2010, Gujarat recorded a Compound annual growth rate of 10.97%, the highest among all Indian states.[66] The system of supplying power to rural areas has been changed radically and has had a greater impact on agriculture than the irrigation works. While states such as Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu provided free electricity to farms, and most other states provided subsidised power, the Gujarat government between 2003–2006 reacted to concerns that such measures result in waste of the power supplied and of groundwater itself. With the Jyotigram Yojana scheme, based on ideas developed by the International Water Management Institute, agricultural supplies were rewired to separate them from other rural supplies and then the electricity used by farms was rationed to fit with scheduled demand for irrigation and consequently to reduce the amount of subsidy being paid. The farmers objected to this at first but came to realise that the outcome was that they were receiving a supply that suffered less from interruption, was of a more consistent voltage and was available when they most needed it for irrigation purposes. Other states have since begun to adopt similar, although not identical, strategies.[64] Debate on Gujarat miracle Modis government has worked to brand Gujarat as a state of dynamic development and economic growth and prosperity, using the slogan Vibrant Gujarat.[68][69][70] However, critics point out that Gujarat has a relatively poor record when it comes to human development, poverty alleviation, nutrition, and education. The state is 13th in India for poverty, 21st for education and 44.7% percent of children under five are underweight and 23% are undernourished putting the state in the alarming category on the Hunger Index.[71] However, officials from the state of Gujarat claim that Gujarat outperformed India as a whole in the rates of improvement of multiple human indicators such as female education, between 2001 and 2011. Furthermore, they state that dropout rates declined from 20% in 2001 to 2% in 2011, and maternal mortality declined by 32% from 2001 to 2011[72] Political scientist Christophe Jaffrelot states that the development in Gujarat has been limited to the urban middle class, whereas rural dwellers and lower castes have become increasingly marginalised. He cites the fact that Gujarat ranks 21st among the 28 Indian states in terms of its Human Development Index, due to the lack of development in rural Gujarat. He states under Modi the number of families living below the poverty line has increased, and that particularly rural adivasi and dalits have become increasingly marginalised.[73] In July 2013, Economics Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen criticised Narendra Modis governance record and said he did not approve of it, under his administration, Gujarats record in education and healthcare is pretty bad.[74] However, economists Arvind Panagariya and Jagdish Bhagwati state that Gujarats social indicator improved from a much lower baseline than other Indian states. They point to Gujarats superior performance in raising literacy rates when compared to other states in India and the rapid improvement of health indicators in Gujarat as evidence that its progress has not been poor by any means.[75] Cabinet issues In 2010 Modi made a speech at Mangrol in which he justified the extrajudicial killing of Sohrabuddin Sheikh, during the election campaign in response to Sonia Gandhis speech calling him a merchant of death,[76] and referred to Sohrabuddins killing. For this speech the Election Commission of India, a constitutional body governing election proceedings in India, cautioned Modi as it considered it as indulging in an activity which may aggravate existing differences between different communities.[77] In 2010 Amit Shah, Modis close confidant and Home minister in his government was indicted for having ordered the killing of Sohrabuddin and two others, after spending three months in jail he was released on bail, and subsequently reelected in one of Ahmedadbads constituencies.[73][78] In 2012 Maya Kodnani another of Modis former ministers from 2007 - 2009 was convicted of having participated in the Naroda Patiya massacre during the 2002 violence.[79][80] She is the first female and first MLA to be convicted in a post-Godhra riots case.[81] While first announcing that it would seek the death penalty for Kodnani, Modis government eventually pardoned her in 2013 and settled for a prison sentence.[82][83][84] Sadbhavana Mission and Fasts During late 2011 and early 2012, Modi undertook a series of fasts as part of a Sadbhavna Mission (Goodwill Mission), meant to reach out to the Muslim community in Gujarat.[85] Modi announced that he believed that his fast would further strengthen Gujarat’s environment of peace, unity and harmony.[86] The mission started on 17 September 2011 in Ahmedabad with a three-day fast aimed at strengthening the atmosphere of peace, unity, and harmony in the state. He observed 36 fasts in 26 districts and 8 cities.[87] Some Muslims were unimpressed with his fasts, and one incident in which Modi refused to wear a skull cap offered to him by a Muslim cleric was deemed an insult by the cleric.[88] When he was fasting in Godhra, the site of the train burning that sparked the 2002 riots, a number of activists were detained for allegedly planning rallies against Modi.[89][90] Others criticized his fast as a public relations mission.[91] Modi himself denied that the mission was about wooing any particular community or religion.[92] Legislation and appointments In 2011, the Gujarat state organisation of Congress banned the Gujarati-language TV 9 television channel from covering its events and prohibited access to its press conferences.[93] Modi criticised this decision, saying that Journalists on Twitter who spoke against Congress, were blocked. Here they banned a TV channel. Their crime is that they exposed cracks in the ghar nu ghar (own your home) scheme of the Congress. Yet this party talks about democracy.[94] On 25 August 2011, the Governor of Gujarat, Kamla Beniwal, appointed Justice R. A. Mehta to the post of Lokayukta of Gujarat, a critical anti–corruption post that had been lying vacant since 2003. Mehta was recommended for the post by the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court in June 2011.[95] Beniwal made this decision without consultation with and approval from Modi and his council of ministers.[96] This marked the beginning of a strained relationship between Modi and Beniwal. On 25 September 2011, Modi accused the Governor of running a parallel government in the state supported by the Indian National Congress party and demanded that she be recalled.[97] The appointment of Mehta was challenged in the High Court by the Gujarat government. The two-member high court bench gave a split verdict on 10 October 2011. In January 2012, a third member upheld Beniwals decision.[98] Modi has also accused Beniwal of delaying a bill for reservation of 50% of seats in local government for women.[99] Modi interacted with netizens on Google+ on 31 August 2012.[100] The chat session was also broadcast live on YouTube.[100] The questions were submitted before the chat, and those broadcast were mostly based on issues about education, youth empowerment, rural development and causes of urbanisation.[101] The hashtag #ModiHangout became the most trending term in India at Twitter on the day of the session, whereas #VoteOutModi, used by Modis opponents, became the third most trending term in the country.[100] The event made Modi the first Indian politician to interact with netizens through live chat on the internet.[102] Fourth term (2012–present) A skyscraper in the under construction GIFT City, described as a pet project of Narendra Modi.[103] Further information: Gujarat legislative assembly election, 2012 In the 2012 Gujarat legislative assembly elections, Modi won from the constituency of Maninagar with a majority of 86,373 votes over Sanjiv Bhatts wife, Shweta, who was contesting for the Indian National Congress.[104] The BJP as a whole won 115 of the 182 seats; it has formed the government in Gujarat since 1995[105] and has had an absolute majority throughout Modis time in office.[106] Later in the by-elections for six seats, the BJP won all the seats in Gujarat which consisted of four assembly seats and 2 Lok Sabha seats. Interestingly, BJP won all these seats although Modi never campaigned for its candidates and all the seats were held by the Congress prior to the by-elections.[107] This brought up the number of seats held by the BJP in the state assembly to 119. Central politics Modi and other BJP leaders after the partys National Executive Meet. Modi was named the chairman of Central Election Campaign Committee during this meet. In March 2013, Modi was appointed as member of the BJP Parliamentary Board, its highest decision-making body, and also as a Chairman of the partys Central Election Campaign Committee.[108][109] Modi was selected to head the poll campaign for 2014 parliamentary election, at the national level executive meeting of BJP on 10 June 2012. The partys senior leader and founding member L.K. Advani resigned from all his posts at the party following the selection, protesting against leaders who were concerned with their personal agendas; the resignation was described by The Times of India as a protest against Narendra Modis elevation as the chairman of the partys election committee.[110] However, Advani withdrew his resignation the next day at the urging of RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat.[110] In September 2013, BJP announced Modi as prime ministerial candidate for the 2014 Lok Sabha polls.[111] Uttarakhand floods controversy On 23 June 2013, The Times of India published a report titled Modi in Rambo act, saves 15,000.[112] The report stated that Modi had commissioned Boeings, SUVs, and luxury buses to rescue 15,000 Gujarati victims of the 2013 Uttarakhand floods.[113][114] The actions as reported by Times of India were widely disbelieved because of the enormity of the task.[115] A controversy followed with allegations that Modi was attempting to create a Rambo image in the minds of the Indian public.[116] Modi was criticised for giving preferential treatment to Gujaratis, and for visiting the area even though the government in Uttarakhand had discouraged such visits to prevent diversion of attention and resources from rescue efforts.[117][118][119] BJP representatives denied that Modi himself had ever stated that he had intervened in the rescue operation, and conceded that perhaps BJP workers had contributed to the impression of Modis personal involvement.[120][121] On 14 July, Times of India published a clarification saying that Modis government had assisted 15,000 flood victims of several states, and not rescued 15,000 Gujaratis as earlier reported.[122] The clarification said that there was no exaggeration of facts or attempts to mislead by the BJP spokesperson, and added that The Times of India was mortified by the controversy surrounding the report.[122][123] After the publication of the clarification, The Times of India report was called a hoax.[122] Media outlets were criticised by the BJP for publishing editorials critical of Modi without checking facts.[124] 2014 general election Modi addressing his first rally after being declared as the Prime Ministerial candidate of the NDA at Rewari, Haryana. Narendra Modi is contesting from Varanasi Lok Sabha constituency in the election. [125] In three opinion polls conducted by news agencies and magazines, Narendra Modi was declared the preferred choice for the post as Prime Minister in the forthcoming parliamentary elections.[126][127][128] A C-Voter poll suggested that by projecting Modi as the Prime Minister candidate, the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) could gain a five percent increase in the vote share; it said that projecting Modi could increase NDAs seats from 179 to 220, which is 52 short of majority.[128] In September 2013, Nielsen and The Economic Times published results of a poll of 100 Indian corporate leaders - 74 of them wanted Modi to be the next prime-minister, compared to 7 whose preference was Rahul Gandhi.[129][130] Commenting on the polls, Political scientist Ashutosh Varshney argued that a BJP Prime Minister was unlikely unless they were able to form broad coalitions with other parties, which so far they have not been able to do.[131] In an interview, Nobel Prize laureate economist Amartya Sen, said that he did not want Modi as a Prime Minister because he had not done enough to make minorities feel safe, and also stated that under Modi, Gujarats record in health and education provision has been pretty bad.[74] However, economists Jagdish Bhagwati and Arvind Panagariya stated We are impressed by Modis economics. [132] Spiritual leaders Ramdev and Morari Bapu have supported Modis Prime Ministerial candidacy.[133] International diplomacy Modi speaking at the World Economic Forums India Economic Summit 2008 in New Delhi. To attract foreign investment in Gujarat during his time as chief minister, Modi has made visits to countries such as China, Singapore and Japan.[134] Modi visited China in November 2006 to study the Special Economic Zones that were planned to start in Gujarat.[135] He also visited in September 2007[136] and later in November 2011. A month after his visit of 2011, the Chinese Government released 13 diamond traders from India who had been jailed by the Shenzhen Customs, which Modi described as being the consequence of his diplomatic efforts and statesmanship.[137][138] In 2005, Modi was denied a diplomatic visa to the United States. In addition, the B-1/B-2 visa that had previously been granted to him was also revoked, under a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act which makes any foreign government official who was responsible or directly carried out, at any time, particularly severe violations of religious freedom ineligible for the visa.[139] In 2011, the Karachi Chamber of Commerce & Industry, impressed with the development of Gujarat, invited Modi to visit Pakistan and address prominent business leaders. They also asked him to consider a flight between Karachi and Ahmedabad, due to the historical cultural and economic relations between the two regions of Gujarat and Sindh. Modi wishes to help Pakistan out of its power crisis, especially in Sindh, suggesting Pakistan can follow the Gujarat Model in two ways — Gujarat Solar Park and Kalpasar Project.[140] The United Kingdom refused to deal with Modi for a decade following the 2002 violence but lifted its diplomatic boycott in October 2012.[141] Later, in March 2013, the European Union, of which the UK is a member, also ended its boycott, saying that talking with Modi was a separate issue from that of protecting human rights and those of women.[142] In July 2013, BJP president Rajnath Singh visited the US and gave a speech urging that Modi should be given a visa to visit the country.[143][144] In response to Singhs visit, 65 Members of the Indian parliament allegedly signed a letter to US President Barack Obama requesting that the policy of denying Modi a visa be upheld.[145] However, the veracity of some of the signatures has been called into question, with Sitaram Yechury among a number of purported signatories denying that they ever signed such a petition[146] In March 2014, when asked if Washington was ready to do business with Modi, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Nisha Biswal commented that the United States has welcomed every leader (of India), and a democratically elected leader of India will be a welcome partner.[147] Personality and image Narendra Modi meeting the South Korean ambassador in Gandhinagar. Modi is a vegetarian.[148] He is known for leading a frugal lifestyle and has a personal staff of three. He is known to be a workaholic and an introvert.[149] He also writes poems in Gujarati.[150] He is a crowd-puller as a speaker.[151] He wears business suits to business meetings, instead of homespun tunics. He still lampoons the urban, English-speaking elite, but he is also honing his English skills.[32] Modi has been labelled by the media and some articles in peer reviewed journals as a controversial, polarising, and divisive figure.[152][153][154] British economist Jim ONeill, author of the BRIC report, wrote on his blog that Modi is good on economics, one of the things that India desperately needs in a leader.[155] In August 2013, financial analyst Chris Wood, chief strategist of CLSA, wrote in his weekly Greed & Fear that the Indian stock markets greatest hope is the emergence of Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi as the BJPs prime ministerial candidate.[155] Awards and recognitions Gujarat Ratna by Shri Poona Gujarati Bandhu Samaj at Ganesh Kala Krida Manch on celebration of centenary year.[156] e-Ratna award by the Computer Society of India[157] Best Chief Minister – In a nationwide survey conducted in 2006 by India Today magazine, Narendra Modi was declared the Best Chief Minister in the country.[158] Asian Winner of the fDi Personality of the Year Award for 2009 by FDi magazine.[159] In March 2012, Modi appeared on the cover of the Asian edition of Time, one of Indias few politicians to have done so.[1
Posted on: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:40:03 +0000