Coal Dust Cancer Cities in Province of B.C., Canada & Clean States For Humans To Live Oregon, U.S.A. - investorshub.advfn/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=107049262 RE: Coal Dust Cancer Cities - Oregon denies Wyoming’s appeal of coal-port rejection Posted by Ralph Schwartz on October 2, 2014 Read more here: bellinghamherald/2014/10/02/3891375/oregon-denies-wyomings-appeal.html#storylink=cpy The state of Oregon denied Wyoming’s appeal of the Beaver State’s rejection of a permit to build a dock for a coal terminal on the Columbia River. Oregon’s Department of State Lands, analogous to Washington’s Department of Natural Resources, ruled on Wednesday, Oct. 1 that the nation’s biggest coal-producing state didn’t have legal standing in the permit decision. Wyoming’s appeal, filed about three weeks after Oregon’s decision on Aug. 18 not to issue a permit for the dock on Coyote Island, near Boardman, Ore., cited the interstate commerce clause in its argument that Oregon was out of line. The terminal, proposed by Ambre Energy of Australia, would have exported about 8 million tons of coal annually. “The department’s decision has harmed and degraded the state’s important and legally protectable revenue streams,” Wyoming’s appeal states. The merits of Wyoming’s argument were never considered by Oregon. Like some local environmentalists had anticipated, Wyoming didn’t have a right to file the appeal. Communications Manager Julie Curtis of DSL sent the following explanation with the Oct. 1 ruling: It’s important to know what our decision was regarding – our director determines if a requestor has “standing” - Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR; 141-085-0575(3)) define who has “standing” to request a contested case hearing on a removal-fill permit decision. Eligible parties are: 1) The applicant. 2) “Aggrieved” persons: The person must have participated in the Department’s review of the project application by submitting written or verbal comments stating a position on the merits of the proposed removal-fill activity to the Department. 3) “Adversely affected” persons: The person must have a legally protected interest that would be harmed, degraded or destroyed by the authorized project. (Not by our permit decision.) We believe the State of Wyoming does not have standing. Note that (3) doesn’t apply to Wyoming because the “adversely affected” person must be adversely affected by the coal terminal, not by the rejection of the permit. Clearly, that’s not the position Wyoming was in. And (2) doesn’t apply to Wyoming, Oregon decided, because “there is no evidence that Wyoming submitted timely written or verbal comments pertaining to the merits of Applicant’s permit application during the Department’s public comment period....,” as the ruling states. Power Past Coal - powerpastcoal.org/ powerpastcoal.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Denied-image.jpg Victory 888 over above - the satan 666 evils nwo demons who is against all humanity and only want their khazarian lucifer of black shoe pawns - to leave in black smoke - A coalition of environmental groups opposed to coal terminals - in the Pacific Northwest, issued a press release today about Oregon’s latest decision: Today, the Oregon Department of State lands (DSL) denied the state of Wyoming’s appeal of the denial of the Morrow Pacific coal export terminal proposed on the Columbia River. The denial was based on Wyoming’s lack of standing to appeal due to their failure to provide comments on the proposal during the comment period. Ruling attached. “Power Past Coal coalition supports the Oregon DSL decision to deny the state of Wyoming’s appeal of the Morrow Pacific coal export terminal on the Columbia River,” Said Cesia Kearns, Power Past Coal campaign director. “If Governor Matt Mead of Wyoming had it his way, Oregon would be forced to build dirty coal export terminals regardless of the impacts to communities, resources like the Columbia River, and fisheries. In the future, we ask that Governor Mead respect the rights of Oregon’s citizens to clean water, clean air and healthy salmon runs. Oregon is headed for a clean energy future and Governor Mead cannot force us back to the 19th Century. Wyoming has some of the greatest wind energy potential in the U.S. We fully support them on building a clean energy economy.” Read more here: bellinghamherald/2014/10/02/3891375/oregon-denies-wyomings-appeal.html#storylink=cpy investorshub.advfn/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=106919110 RE: Coal Dust Cancer - NEWS ARTICLES & OPEN LETTER TO PREMIER, ETC... FROM MULTIPLE FAITH BASED GROUPS - From BC: Open letter to Premier Christy Clark, Minister of Enivironment, Minister of Health, Minister of Transportation & Infrastructure, from Faith Based groups: Christian, Jewish, Unitarian, Quaker, and Sikh traditions of BC- vtacc.org/content/pdf/Letter_%20Clergy_%20Premier.pdf thestar/news/canada/2014/05/12/criminal_negligence_charges_filed_in_deadly_lacmgantic_train_crash.html Rail shipments of flammable materials to BC reach new heights: vancouversun/news/Rail%20shipments%20flammable%20materials%20reach%20heights/9828867/story.html delta-optimist/coal-proposal-under-federal-jurisdiction-1.1024352 From US: daily.sightline.org/2014/05/13/northwest-region-averaging-nine-freight-train-derailments-per-month/ billingsgazette/news/state-and-regional/montana/daines-coal-stakeholders-alarmed-by-new-washington-state-pollution-laws/article_fb25d1a5-10b6-58c0-bb21-e5aae2f01e19.html#ixzz31c79YOeL 9news/story/news/local/2014/05/09/millikin-train-derailment/8899541/ seattletimes/html/opinion/2023564023_lancedickiecolumnclimatechange09xml.html ecowatch/2014/05/08/warren-buffett-coal-plants-solar-energy/ (Remember Goldman Sachs sold it shares in Wa. State coal terminal to wealthy Mexican businessman: cleantechnica/2014/01/10/goldman-sachs-sells-stake-coal-terminal/). Developers planning massive coal export terminal in Mexico to serve US producers: snl/InteractiveX/Article.aspx?cdid=A-28041715-15144 nypost/2014/03/17/mexican-drug-cartel-moves-from-meth-to-iron-ore-mining/ mining/mexican-drug-lords-get-firm-grip-on-countrys-mines-91727/ Improving air quality in NYC would boost childrens future earnings by increasing IQ: sciencedaily/releases/2014/05/140508095834.htm news.nationalgeographic/news/energy/2014/05/140509-pacific-northwest-salish-sea-fossil-fuel-gateway/ China: rtcc.org/2014/05/12/chinas-coal-emissions-could-peak-by-2020/ -- Stephanie Smith COMMUNITIES AND COAL. communitiesandcoal/ htp://CoalFreeWhiteRock.ca facebook/NoCoalSurreyWhiteRock Property prices will go to zero - No one will live in a COAL DUST CITY - Ex. NEW WESTMINSTER COAL CITY, B.C., Canada - White Rock to BLACK ROCK, B.C., Canada - INSANE - Coal Harbour is the old name for a section of Burrard Inlet City - Vancouver, B.C., Canada - Has adopted to be the New Cancer Coal Dust City - Vancouver used to be called the green city for long time - New nwo 666 polotickz turning back the time >100 years - to make it into - Coal Harbour, B.C., Canada - again ? - history often repeat itself - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal_Harbour Urbanization Has Destroyed Our World - People are being herded little cattle into big mega COAL DUST cities! - More COAL DUSTY >1862 fooled to live in COAL DUST - Worse than a hardrock coal mine - it has less COAL DUST - Its against humanity - the COAL DUST make Lung Cancer to skyrocket - jesus-is-savior/Evils%20in%20Government/urbanization.htm Good Health is our Real Wealth - God Bless.
Posted on: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 09:14:23 +0000