Company A wants to pass some law favorable to his company. But he - TopicsExpress



          

Company A wants to pass some law favorable to his company. But he just doesnt want his name in the deal. So company A finds others who will join him. He finds company B and C. They dont want their names involved as funders either. So companies A, B, and C find and fund a group D. A , B and C pooled quite a bit of money lets say 60k. They front this money and start spreading it around funding group Ds efforts. Group D may or may not know they are strawman. Now group D has on it books a liability payable to the anonymous members of A, B and C for the money they secretly fronted (Secretly because their names are reported no where in lobbyist reports). So A B C and D ask another group E to pay this money off. There is also politicians F and G who recieved some of ABCDEF funds but all in the name of group D. ABC wanting to be secret and their money back is likely the mistake that identifies them. Because group D and group E are both non profits those funds are supposed to be transparent. Some questions I have has GAPPS and MAAPPS taken the NAPPS money and given and/or converted it back to the A, B, and C players? If you read this and wonder where the problem is well your conscience has been seared. Id also like to know whether Phil Geron and Gerald Calusurdo had anything to do with Frosh and the Maryland consumer group developing the actions leading to the failed legislative regulatory schema. My other question is: Does it sound like this following link? justice.gov/opa/pr/2014/August/14-crm-848.html For all you fisherman out there who catch on ever cast congratulations. I have never been that good. But eventually I catch the big ones.
Posted on: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 22:05:38 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015