Competition Overview: Great cities in the United States share many qualities such as; density, walkability, multi-modal transportation, strong communities, sustainable economies, vivacious culture and great open spaces all of which help to create a clear sense of identity. To a great extent these qualities are either created or enhanced with thoughtful design. Phoenix and Tucson are on the verge of taking their place as two of the nation’s great cities. The goal of this competition is to demonstrate how, with thoughtful design, we can improve our desert cities. Phoenix is now the 6th largest city by population in the US. Out of the top ten largest cities, Phoenix is by far the youngest and second largest in area. Because of its youth, lack of natural boundaries, and rapid growth over the past 60 years, the city has had a difficult time determining its identity. Tucson, on the other hand, is considerably older and smaller, with a stronger sense of identity- though, like Phoenix, is still grappling with how to develop its downtown area into a great destination for its inhabitants. The amazingly sunny and arid climate of the region is a major draw to both cities, and should be a driving force in all aspects of design and development. Though there are climatic similarities to other desert cities in Africa, Arabia, and Asia, the relative youth of our cities and distinctive ecosystems and economic models provide for unique opportunities. This competition seeks to demonstrate how we should develop our cities to take advantage of our climate, provide identity of place, and create great urban environments. Location & Need This competition provides a choice of two sites: One in Phoenix and one in Tucson. In each case, the sites are located along urban rail transportation (light rail and streetcar, respectively). Each has distinct opportunities to provide for and feed off of their urban conditions - it is important to build upon this existing synergy. Though few programmatic requirements are provided in the brief, all proposals should feed, utilize and/or create urban elements that make great livable cities; such as working, residing, and socializing. Entrants are encouraged to research what is around the site and provide for greater diversity and programmatic cross-pollination. As the sites are adjacent to rail, there should be a less focus on individual automobiles and a greater focus towards multimodal transportation (walking, cycling, public transport). Design plays a huge part of creating neighborhoods that have a human scale, mobility, identity, physical health, and personal security, as demonstrated in Jeff Speck’s book, Walkable City. Another important need of our desert region is to have buildings and spaces that recognize the local environment. Local water independence is critical to economically viable urban areas. Proposals must take advantage of passive and active climatic elements allowing comfort for people in and around the buildings. This should be accomplished by not just by minimizing environmental harm, but by adding to the urban experience. Competition entries should utilize biomimicry, shade, landscape, and microclimates as well as attempt on-site water neutrality. Entrants should become familiar with the Living Building Challenge. Though it would be extremely difficult for entrants to adhere to all of the LBC’s standards, we ask entrants present designs that aim towards net-zero water usage according to LBC standards. We are providing detailed information to assist in this portion.
Posted on: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:54:37 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015