Conversation started Saturday Derek Flegg 9/27, 8:26pm Derek Flegg Hi Subject - darkmatter/spacetime I see your an admin in Einsteins Special Relativity and General Relativity and would like to ask a favor. I have a different idea about darkmatter. Please read. If you can understand what Ive written - can you help me say it in way others might understand. I have ADD and dont think of it as some kind of disability but as an ability not everyone has. Unfortunately it makes communicating an idea difficult. Ive taken two ideas, the notion of darkmatter and something some famous physicist said about particles when he was answering questions kids asked. The question was. - Can particles get smaller forever. - His reply was that if they did, eventually theyd become so small they could have no direct effect on the universe and as such couldnt matter because they would be outside the universe anyway. (Or something like that) So at the time Id been thinking a lot about time and other dimensions when it hit me. Darkmatter is composed of particles so small as to be outside the universe which meant spacetime is made of something -Darkmatter/spacetime. With this idea I have worked out a way (sane) to show that quantum mechanics and its slit test are wrong. ak8.picdn.net/shutterstock/videos/1318660/preview/stock-footage-balancing-balls-newton-s-cradle-seamless-loop.jpg... Think if each ball was a dark particle and only detectable as it receives and transmits force, its tiny mass becoming undetectable again after the wave or force has passed - would look like a moving object or photon - making the slit test wrong.. The dark particle and wave combine to create the illusion of a photon. Because the space between dark particles is really super tiny the transmission of force is the speed of light. Gravity - Matter displaces darkmatter/spacetime causing a vibration in darkmatter leading me to think gravity is like vibrating sand and how larger objects will sink into vibrating sand. The more matter that sinks into darkmatter the denser the central mass the greater the displacement/vibration of darkmatter and could be what happens to create a blackhole object in a feeding loop. Darkmatter/spacetime is like crossing the surface of another universe inside this one filling the same volume and a limited slip drag causes the experience of time. At the speed of light darkmatter/spacetime is a solid wall. Imagine the magnet, iron filings and paper. The field isnt coming from the magnet, its how matter is displacing the darkmatter/spacetime immediately aound it like a bubble. It is an indirect way to see darkmatter/spacetime. Think of the magnet as it nears the speed of light and that field pulls back around it, darkmatter/spacetime becoming compressed - time slows down. Empty space is like a zero on paper, it holds a place. People looking for darkmatter have been looking right through it. Why dont we cling to the surface of earth if gravity is like a magnet. The same way metal doesnt cling to the paper, the metal is clinging to the magnet and the paper is in the way. Does artificial gravity sound tricky now? stock-footage-balancing-balls-newton-s-cradle-seamless-loop.jpg ak8.picdn.net Wolf Dancer 9/27, 8:30pm Wolf Dancer You have really wasted your time typing this out I have to tell you. I will give you one reply to one part, gravity is not a strong force. The static electricity on your hair is enough to hold a balloon to the ceiling against the pull of the entire earth so no we do not cling to the ground. Derek Flegg 9/27, 8:33pm Derek Flegg The dark particle and wave combine to create the illusion of a photon. and Im off Thank you. for your opinion so quickly Oh and thank you for approving my request Derek Flegg 9/27, 8:45pm Derek Flegg By the way the favor I asked wasnt do you like the idea it was can you help say it better Wolf Dancer 9/27, 9:27pm Wolf Dancer Sorry but no why should I do that? Derek Flegg 9/27, 9:50pm Derek Flegg I didnt say you should either, I politely asked a favor. A yes or no question that has already been determined by your unfriendly attitude and quick dismissal. Nothing ventured, nothing gained and its still nice to meet you *handshakes* Wolf Dancer 9/27, 10:43pm Wolf Dancer It isnt unfriendly but I am not mowing your lawn either, capice? But you are right I dismiss non-standard science out of hand. Sunday Derek Flegg 9/28, 10:55am Derek Flegg Thats good too. Find holes in the idea.. Ive taken it upon myself to assume you are above average intelligence and has a good working knowledge of the theories ramble on about.. Id take it as a blessing and a big help. For now please allow me to show you where this has gone with admin in your group. Ravi Roy. I am not demoralising you but there is something you should know. You said With this idea I have worked out a way (sane) to show that quantum mechanics and its slit test are wrong. Sorry to say this but though quantum mechanics looks wierd, it is correct and it is being verified millions of times. Coming to the dark matter, it is composed of weakly interacting massive particles that interact only through gravity and the weak force. You said At the speed of light darkmatter/spacetime is a solid wall. You will have to explain the mechanism behind dark matter becoming a solid wall at the speed of light. Further I want to say that you should have a Mathematical model of what you are saying. It looks easy to understand the Mathematics. Today Derek Flegg 9:07am Derek Flegg Thank you so much for your reply and good to meet you *handshakes* Ok first I have to tell you I have 4 kids, age 7 to age 6 months and they can make it really hard to hold a thought. Please bear with me. Im a full time at home dad You are simply stating that which I would change with my model. Im purposing another other concept for what darkmatter is. Being that it is composed of regular every day matter, only really really tiny, so tiny they are mathematically to small to have any direct influence on this universe or particle of it and these particles all together form spacetime. Think about the properties of an element composed of particles so massively tiny as to be outside the universe. It would be both very very dense while appearing to have no mass. Its not that a dark particle doesnt have mass, it does, in its own frame of reference. If there were no photons in motion, would the test be wrong? The dark particle and wave combine to create the illusion of a moving photon, the dark particle is only detectable as it receives and transmits force. ak8.picdn.net/shutterstock/videos/1318660/preview/stock-footage-balancing-balls-newton-s-cradle-seamless-loop.jpg... Is the transmission of force from the first ball to last ball instant in Newtons cradle? No. Why. Because at the way down just tiny level there is a gap between the balls right. Nothing really touches. Take my idea of darkmatter, the balls are so tiny as to be outside of the universe and can have no effect on this universe directly - think about how tiny the spaces between dark particles would be if you could make a Newtons cradle out of my version of darkmatter. Individual dark particles can have no influence on the universe but all of them together -can- indirectly influence us. The building block for distance which gives us time. Darkmatter is Spacetime. Thats why it can be warped and bent.. Why gravity and time and velocity are linked. To answer a question with a question, How fast would I have to be going before water would would be like hitting a solid? Same principle applies to darkmatter. And it is easy, straight up simple... I think in pictures, like a multidimensional jugsaw puzzle. I havent needed math till now.. stock-footage-balancing-balls-newton-s-cradle-seamless-loop.jpg ak8.picdn.net Derek Flegg 10:05am Derek Flegg Ive been on the edge of this idea a long time and only now does it start to come into focus, now I need the math to say it. I had to finish the thought first. You know what I mean? Derek Flegg 10:32am Derek Flegg With this the speed of light has a reason to be finite, gravity and magnetism are frequencies of the same force, where and what other dimensions/universes are made of. They are made of the same stuff in the same way only how do you hide that? The same way you create time is where you hide those other dimensions/universes and crossing the surface of them has a drag effect. The faster you go the greater the drag/time distortion. You can alter the speed of sound by messing with its medium. Think at the core of a blackhole is an object dense enough to displace a lot of darkmatter/spacetime. Derek Flegg 10:39am Derek Flegg I imagine the magnet being like a particle approaching the speed of light, the drag caused by traveling over the surface of darkmatter increases the theoretical mass and the field stretches back, the speed of light is where it snaps. stock-footage-balancing-balls-newton-s-cradle-seamless-loop.jpg ak8.picdn.net Sunday Wolf Dancer 9/28, 4:55pm Wolf Dancer Q. Where did you go wrong with Ravi? A. Have you any idea how many people show up in our group with their own ideas which have no observational or experimental basis? Not one has had anything of any merit to offer. The answer to where the holes are in your essay is everywhere. I dont mean this as an insult but there is not the least merit to any of it. Being a nice guy doesnt make a bad idea a good one. Before anybody will give the least consideration to any new ideas you have to demonstrate you comprehend the presently accepted ones. Short of doing that, nobody will care in the least. Today Derek Flegg 9:05am Derek Flegg My idea does present accepted observations and does show I understand the current ones, my idea doesnt change any of that, it simply applies those observations and experiments already made and applies them. The only thing I have suggested differently is the interpretations of one test is wrong if you use my model of darkmatter and my explanation for why its dark. There is nothing special about darkmatter accept it is really really tiny, so tiny its mass doesnt exist to us and can have absolutely no direct effect on our much more massive matter. But all of it together (spacetime/darkmatter) does indirectly play a roll as spacetime, which I imagine the dark particles are like little magnets themselves, all clinging desperately together. This is why I describe gravity as a displacement effect. When an object we can observe become more massive it starts displacing mora spacetime/darkmatter and it squeezes back making matter more dense, as it becomes more dense it displaces more darkmatter in a cycle - for as long as more mass is being added. Now unless you say there is a law that prevents regular everyday matter from having a mass that tiny - you can not say my interpretation of darkmatter is wrong or even invalid. I believe any math I need to do to prove this interpretation of darkmatter is possible - is simple algebra to figure out how small these particles would be if I had to be going at the speed of light to run into them like they were a solid wall and how tiny the space between dark particles would have to be to transfer force at the speed of light. Then those two calculations should match to confirm it, right? One of your admins replied to me that there is no outside the universe, thats not exactly true and not what I mean by outside the universe. Another dimension would in effect be another universe inside this one. I just expect everyone to know what I mean when they have the same interests I do. If ever you see me use the word god - I use that word for lack of a better one. Derek Flegg 9:09am Derek Flegg Where did I go wrong - he thought I was threatening his belief structure? and thank you for the compliments both in saying I was or seemed nice - and that you replied at all. Derek Flegg 9:52am Derek Flegg The mass of an object (particle or brick) at the speed of light occupies an equal amount of darkmass (and cancel each out?) At the speed of light what volume of spacetime is occupied by the objects mass in any given instant you care to use. How do I say that in math? Wolf Dancer 10:15am Wolf Dancer Derek I appreciate your interest but I do not have time for individual discussions like this, that is what the group is for. No your assumption is incorrect, the tiniest amount of energy or mass has no different properties than any other just because they are tiny. Relativisitic effects extend to all levels including atomic. Also no, anything that relates to this Universe is by definition part of this Universe including the up to 31 possible dimensions. These are textbook mistakes. It is like the old thing about building a house on sand instead of rock. Fermions cannot attain light speed. By relativistic equations there is not enough energy in the entire universe to accelerate even one proton to light speed. Finally no we do not feel our belief systems challenged we feel our scientific conclusions have been proven, whereas you are making unfounded assumptions and textbook mistakes. Now I cant keep answering these direct for just one person, go into the group and ask questions so that all 40,000 members can potentially benefit from the answers not just you, ok? :)
Posted on: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:01:46 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015