Criticism of Israel and the double speech: What disturbs the great majority of my critics is that my universalist vision and open words are as reasonable and consistent as my articulated criticism of the Israeli state. This greatly disturbs hardcore Zionists. In fact, to make illegitimate and inaudible, my criticism of Israeli policy, they must cast doubt and suspicion on the authentic and reasonableness of my open and universalistic discourse. This is the source of this beautiful invention of the famous double speech ... cast doubt on the person when there is no argument on the discourse, and make questionable the universalist discourse to make illegitimate criticism of Israel. Examples? Caroline Fourest, Pierre-André Taguieff, Bernard-Henry Levy, Douglas Murray, the CRIF and even Hassen Chalgoumy, etc. (and to paraphrase Magritt, This is not a list) :-)
Posted on: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 20:34:01 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015