DARK MATTER IN THE SINGULOSYNTHESIS UNIVERSE In “The path to understanding the rational universe” I describe a possible solution to the black hole information paradox that nobody has ever considered. That solution being, physical information and entropy maintained (by an unknown method) within a black hole horizon only to be reassigned later. “The path to understanding the rational universe” is a pre requisite to anything I put forward in this paper. Please take time to read it before continuing for I will move forward in this paper under the assumption it has already be read and understood. “Rational Universe Theory” philosophically plants a flag in favor of an information conservation principle for the universe. Now the question becomes, can a philosophical argument lead to a superior mathematical model? This approach has been taken in the past and that is my goal. While a full blown computer simulation proof of the theory remains in the works, there are some sound ideas that can be inferred from a cosmology or universe model based upon the idea of Singulosynthesis (binary black hole synthesis). The following is a statement regarding what we perceive and what is a consequence due to limitations on our perception. One can waste an entire lifetime arguing against an irrational consensus or attempt to destroy an irrational consensus through use of superior reasoning. The Current Scientific Consensus Composition of the Universe 4.9% - ordinary matter 26.8% - dark matter 68.3% - dark energy (Note: Totals are from Wikipedia and cross referenced with a few other sources. I am not sure how black holes fit into these totals.) The Singulosynthesis Universe Current Composition and Beginnings 15.5% - ordinary matter (mass with entropy and physical information) 84.5% - dark matter (Singulosynthesis remnant of non-temporal mass and energy which is magnetism in a volume of space) 0% - dark energy - Is a perceived effect of Singulosynthesis converting temporal mass and energy into magnetized volumes of space. (Note: These totals may need adjusting due to how black holes are classified by the current scientific consensus; black holes may require their own category.) What could dark matter be? What could perceived dark energy be? What is a black hole? What is mass? What is magnetism? How can an argument be formulated when there is no consensus even regarding the terms being used? How can we find some answers? First some distinctions need to be made. There is a temporal state of the universe governed by the inverse square law that most are familiar with and there is a non-temporal state of our universe which is not governed by the inverse square law that even I am just beginning to figure out. Included in the following is a cosmology completely outside the context of the big bang that is based on the best current observations. While Singulosynthesis (binary black hole synthesis) should ultimately be simulated there are some ideas that can be inferred just considering it. A black hole in the Singulosynthesis (binary black hole synthesis) model of the universe is a temporally neutral state of mass with a temporal horizon which is governed by some rules. From the temporal side of a black hole horizon (our side which is governed by the inverse square law) there is a physical information and entropy boundary at the gravitational radius (Schwarzschild radius). Once a black hole’s entropy and physical information boundary fills up there is an overflow mechanism (likely based on the Bekenstein bound) at the Planck length scale (this ideally should be simulated to pin down the three way process). The non-temporal side of a black hole horizon (inside the gravitational radius) ignores physical information and entropy that exists on the temporal side on the gravitational radius. In that sense, a black hole horizon is a temporal filter for mass. This then brings into question, what is temporal mass and energy? “Mass” in the Singulosynthesis universe is “temporally assigned magnetism”. A black hole temporal radius will accept mass (temporal magnetism) regardless of what is going on outside the gravitational radius, so long as a gravitational horizon exists from the temporal side. From the temporal side (outside the gravitational radius of the perceived temporal horizon) there is an entropy and physical information horizon which determines how duality is stripped from mass, how physical information and entropy are stored at the Planck scale, how physical information and entropy are reassigned during an overflow state, and how duality is reassigned back into duality by the Singulosynthesis process mechanism [The Singulosynthesis process will reassign existing horizon physical information and entropy by establishing or re-establishing duality to non-temporal mass and energy during the Singulosynthesis process (ideally must to be simulated]. Relativistic jets are an over flow mechanism which offload the difference between what a black hole horizon can and cannot handle in terms of physical information and entropy volume. Once Singulosynthesis is finished and the reassigning of physical information and entropy at the temporal side gravitational radius is done, a temporal horizon will remain over the remaining non-temporal mass and energy (magnetism in a volume of space). A temporally neutral black hole gravitational radius will always accept temporal mass and energy (temporally assigned magnetism) or reassign non-temporal mass and energy (magnetism in a volume of space) through Singulosynthesis, a non-temporal mass and energy (magnetism in a volume of space) with no entropy or physical information horizon remaining will no longer accept temporal mass and energy (temporally assigned magnetism), for it is no longer a black hole which is a temporally neutral state of mass (magnetism in a volume of space). If magnetism in a volume of space is a property of non-temporal mass and energy, then a black hole temporal gravitational radius must govern how the Pauli Exclusion Principle interacts with temporal matter (temporally assigned magnetism). If temporal mass and energy is temporally assigned magnetism and non-temporal mass and energy is magnetism in a volume of space one can see how considering such a scenario could get confusing. This confusion has led to a number of semantic difficulties when attempting to communicate with “professionals” various concepts regarding my ideas. So why do I not yet have a final proof? Please consider the following model while I explain why I haven’t fully figured this out on my own yet on my own. (Please see figure1a) I suspect general relativity governs everything in the universe, even the assignment of duality which is temporal mass and energy (temporally assigned magnetism) and the stripping of duality into non temporal mass and energy (magnetism in a volume of space). While a deterministic process, all conditions for this occurring are extreme. Black holes will synthesize their temporal physical information and entropy horizons based on their mass at the binary relativistic orbital velocity of the speed of light. If relativistic jets are temporal gravitational radius overflow mechanisms which have reached a Bekenstein bound type limit, I have an idea of what may be occupying a temporal black hole gravitational horizon. As I figure out what is actually fundamental and critical to the simulation, I am figuring out some other things in the process. Hence, enough for this second paper. Even without a comprehensive simulation of the former, allow me to put forward a universe model governed by such a mechanism as Singulosynthesis. In the Singulosynthesis (binary black hole synthesis) universe model Dark Energy is a perceived effect, I will do my best to interpret my ideas clearly to avoid any potential semantic confusion. Going forward I will refer to terms such as “temporal mass and energy and energy” which is also “temporally assigned magnetism” and “non-temporal mass and energy” which is “magnetism in a volume of space” to avoid confusion (Note: previously I used named place holder theoretical objects for the sake of my modeling which has only led to further confusion. I will attempt to use those place holders as seldom as possible). Going forward I am going to just state some things and explain them along the way to the best of my ability. To figure out where we are going, we must first consider where we have been. Singulosynthesis fuels the universe by converting temporal mass and energy into non-temporal mass and energy. Applying the percentage of perceived dark energy 68.3% to the true existing dark matter which is 84.5%, you get a total of 57.7135% of the total currently perceived 84.5% dark matter has actually been produced through Singulosynthesis since the initial event of Singulosynthesis at the beginning of the universe. Increased non-temporal mass and energy (magnetized volumes of space) have been produced through Singulosynthesis and galaxies are progressive buildups of these magnetized space volumes. If the universe is comprised of 57.7135% more dark matter and no dark energy, where is this extra dark matter or extra magnetized space volume hiding? It is hiding inside of every star and galaxies are speeding up because they are converting temporal mass and energy and energy (temporally assigned magnetism) into non temporal mass and energy (magnetism in a volume of space). The Singulosynthesis universe began with 26.7865% dark matter, 73.2135% matter, and 0% dark energy. This accounts for the 46.427% metallicity discrepancy we observe based on predictions made by other more popular cosmological models. Singulosynthesis (black hole synthesis) performs two functions in the universe. One, it recycles physical information and entropy. Two, it permanently exiles temporal mass and energy and energy (temporally assigned magnetism) into non-temporal mass and energy (magnetism in a volume of space). Since this is how I argue our universe began and the process also deterministically repeats itself, out of any black holes 100% mass, the Singulosynthesis process should always end leaving at minimum a 26.7865% non-temporal degeneracy mass remnant of the formerly temporal neutral black hole, which is actually a magnetized volume of magnetized space. Binary black holes must maintain the relativistic binary orbital velocity of the speed of light to perform Singulosynthesis. While the process of Singulosynthesis should be ideally simulated in order to be fully understood, there are some things we can infer for the existence of this process I am arguing for. Singulosynthesis occurs at the metallicity rate we observe in the universe overtime through the reassignment of entropy and physical information and Singulosynthesis is responsible for the expansion of the universe through the conversion of temporal mass and energy and energy (temporally assigned magnetism) into non-temporal mass and energy (magnetism in a volume of space). According to big bang cosmology, the first generation stars in the universe formed without any magnetism at all. How can you form a hydrostatic equilibrium of plasma (a star) without any magnetism to begin with? You can’t, and it is impossible despite all the cool graphics you see in TV programs. Population 3 stars are impossible entities under any version of big bang cosmology and yet the first stars had to come from somewhere. The Singulosynthesis universe begins comprised of a 26.7865 percent non-temporal mass and energy (magnetism in a volume of space). The beginning of the Singulosynthesis universe occurs at the CMBR, it is the birth of our original cosmic duality and nothing exists in our perceived Singulosynthesis universe before that point. This means at minimum 26.7865% percent of all stars are formed around magnetized volume of space which is non-temporal mass and energy. All stars must form around a magnetized volume of space which becomes compacted into a stars internal magnetic core dynamo, and that would include our own Sun. How can we attempt to calculate what the non-temporal mass and energy (magnetized volume of space) quantity compacted within our own Sun should be? Apply perceived percentage of dark energy to the true existing quantity of dark matter (which is actually a magnetized volume of space): 84.5 x .683 = 57.7135 % is to total magnetized volume of space produced through Singulosynthesis. Subtract Singulosynthesis produced magnetized volume of space from currently perceived magnetized volume of space (currently called dark matter): 84.5 - 57.7135 = 26.7865% magnetized volume of space at the beginning of Singulosynthesis Universe. The Singulosynthesis Universe Composition Beginnings 26.7865% magnetized volume of space (Singulosynthesis will always end with a magnetized volume of space and this is the best number I have right now, thanks to the Planck Satellite data) 73.2135% matter 0% dark energy Our Suns magnetized core is made up of a compacted non-temporal mass and energy (magnetized volume of space) created during its formation. It is a non-fusible magnetic mass which not only assisted in formation, it adds to maintaining the hydrostatic equilibrium of the star. 1 solar mass x .267865 = .267865 solar mass non fusible magnetized volume of space: 53266 X10^30 kg Our Suns has .732135 solar mass fusible mass: 1.45589 X 10^30 kg A temporal Gravitational radius is a neutral non-temporal mass and energy (magnetized volume of space): radius as well: 2GM/c^2 = Rs (Schwarzschild Radius) (2 (6.67384e-11) (.53266 X10^30 kg)) / 299,792,458^2 = 791.069180m 7.10977523e19 / 299,792,458^2 = 791.069180m Calculating minimum final degeneracy for temporal neutral mass density at perceived infinite gravity Volume of a Sphere= 4/3 Pi R^3 Volume of a Sphere = 4/3 Pi 495043536.1919463m Volume of a Sphere = Pi 6.60058048e^8 m^3 Volume of a Sphere = 2.07363351e^9 m^3 Density = M/V D = .53266e^30kg/2.07363351e^9 m^3 D = 2.56872778e^20 kg m^3 You need to start from somewhere. That is my mass density calculation for a magnetized volume of space to become temporally neutral mass. It is also the mass density calculation for what is now called the black hole Singularity which is actually a temporally neutral state of mass. Regarding space, non-temporal mass and energy (magnetism in a volume of space) abides by some different rules. A magnetized volume of space is a mass existing outside of our temporal horizon. Once Singulosynthesis is finished and only a temporal horizon remains over the once temporally neutral mass, if a temporally neutral black hole horizon is governed by 2GM/C^2 law, the horizon of non-temporal mass and energy should be larger because it is at infinite gravity, infinite gravity does not abide by the inverse square law and therefore displaces more space 2GM/C. This is how temporally neutral mass is transferred into non temporal mass and energy in the form of magnetism within a volume of space time when Singulosynthesis ends. Calculating a Temporal Horizon area of a non-temporal final degeneracy mass at infinite temporal gravity (magnetized volume of space) (nt) = non temporal The inverse square law does not apply since it is Non Temporal horizon 2GM/c = R(nt) 2GM/c = (2 (6.67384e-11) (.53266 X10^30 kg)) / 299,792,458 = 7.10977523e19/299,792,458 = 2.37156574e11 m R (nt) = 2.37156574e11 m R (nt) = 2.37156574e8 km R (nt) = 237,156,574 km This is the maximum calculated magnetized volume of space can be occupied at .53266 X10^30 kg (max volume of non-temporal mass and energy). When a star forms, this volume of magnetized space is crushed into the core dynamo of every star. Creating a large enough star from a large enough volume of magnetized space and a neutral horizon in the form of a black hole can be re-established during core collapse. While our star lacks enough mass to re-establish a temporally neutral state of mass, it is a rational starting point for considering a number of exotic magnetized objects in the universe. This is my first attempt at a rough dimension of how non temporal mass and energy displacement occurs in the form of magnetized volume of space and is probably the cause for error range in a number of constants. While primitive, this is a business major graduate’s first attempt at calculating space time geometry. Magnetized volumes of space are displaced by converting temporal mass and energy into non temporal mass and energy through Singulosynthesis (a deterministic process that should ideally simulated). I am starting to get some numbers for my program. Mass density starting point for Rambo = fairly reasonable to me and is the beginning point for the simulation mentioned in my other paper. If the inverse square law does not pertain to a temporally neutral gravitational horizon, it will also not pertain to mass energy equivalency for mass in a non-temporal state. The perceived effect of Dark Energy is a byproduct of converting temporal mass and energy (temporally assigned magnetism) into non temporal mass and energy (magnetism in a volume of space). Einsteins Mass Energy Equivalency assumes a temporal state since a temporal state is governed by the inverse square law C^2. E = MC^2 Mass(temporal) Energy(temporal) equivalency E(t) = M(t)C^2 Mass(non-temporal) Energy(non -temporal) equivalency E(nt) = M(nt)C Mass(non-temporal) is magnetism in a volume of a space. Mass(non-temporal) is not governed by the inverse square law for it is outside our perceived temporal horizon. E(nt) is the perceived effect of Dark Energy and progressive concentrations of magnetism as seen in galaxies as they evolve. Our universe is not speeding up due to a Dark Energy accelerating it. The universe is speeding up because it is progressively converting temporal mass and energy into non-temporal mass and energy (magnetism in a volume of space). Galaxies are progressive concentrations of magnetized space volumes created by the conversion of temporal mass and energy (temporally assigned magnetism) to non-temporal mass and energy (magnetism in a volume of space). I suspect that all non-temporal mass and energy (magnetic volumes of space) produced after the first occurrence of Singulosynthesis (which occurred at the CMBR) have produced a different charge. As galaxies increased in non-temporal mass and energy (magnetism in a volume of space) over time they have progressively repelled the original magnetized volume of space that allowed the first stars to form. There are some other possibilities in the works as well. It is through the simulation of black hole synthesis that I hope to discover if and why this is the case. Magnetic volumes of space are compacted during stellar proto star accretion to form the internal dynamo of all stars. However, I suspect a universe model comprising of 73.2135% matter and 26.7865% magnetized space would boil over through Singulosynthesis progressively (this is like stage 4 or 5 on my simulation list). Every star ever formed had to have formed in the presence of existing magnetism, the big bang model does not have this. Forming a star in the big bang model of the universe creates 2 out comes via any model I have seen ranging from, stars blowing themselves apart during ignition before they can reach a hydro static equilibrium or all large stars collapse into an Un-nova. At present, I see a whole bunch of stars and not any Un-nova’s have yet to been observed. The internal magnetic field of all stars cause’s drag on a star’s rotation is not generated completely by core fusion. All stars have the burden of needing enough core mass to crush through existing compacted volumes of magnetized space which exists today in the core of every star. Certain type 1a supernovas offer an opportunity to reveal a non-temporal degeneracy mass around which a star once formed. Unlike any other form of super nova, a type 1a remnant or event with a known existing companion star will leave behind a non-compacted magnetized volume of space we can indirectly observe. It is the magnetized volume of space around which the star had formed. For the sake of modeling I will use Tychos remnant as a guide. Since type 1a supernovas occur at the Chandrasekhar limit of 1.44 solar masses my cosmology predicts a minimum of a .3857256 solar mass magnetized volume of space within the remnant, it is what the star formed around. Following the path from the remnants blast shadow created by a companion star, past the companion star will lead you to the vicinity of the progenitor stars original magnetized volume of space. Lurking within Tychos remnant 8 - 9.8k light years away will be a .3857256 solar mass magnetized volume of space. This object will be transparent and may gravitationally lens light in the way galactic scale dark matter does. All type 1a supernova remnants with identified companion stars should have these non-compacted magnetized volumes of space if my ideas have any basis in reality. Some questions that need answering: Does the current scientific consensus count black holes as matter when they are actually in a temporally neutral state? Temporal mass and energy are governed by the Pauli exclusion principle. Non-temporal mass and energy create the Pauli exclusion principle. What happens at a temporal gravitational horizon to create this effect? If a temporal black hole gravitational radius applies the Pauli Exclusion Principle a property of a un perturbed horizon, how would the properties of the horizon have to change during Singulosynthesis to reverse the process? If the Bekenstein bound is applicable to black hole horizons could relativistic jets be entropy and physical information overflow mechanisms? Does the Bekenstein bound manage dark matter production under Singulosynthesis and gravitational wave population or is there another mechanism? Exactly how sure are we that a stars internal magnetic field is created by fusion in a star core? How long will our Sun last if it is comprised of a minimum of 26.7865% infusible magnetized timeless degeneracy mass? References (With regard to the extensive reference list, so many ideas went into the formulation of my own, I would not want to deprive due credit to all that produced work that was influential in my ideas. For that reason, here is a list of every bookmark I have used in formulating my ideas.) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_information_paradox en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Matter youtube/watch?v=SwyTaSt0XxE foxnews/science/2013/06/10/lightweight-galaxy-is-smallest-ever-found/ abc.net.au/science/articles/2011/09/21/3322710.htm#.UaOvhZwsbAQ foxnews/science/2013/01/11/largest-structure-in-universe-discovered/ astro.cornell.edu/academics/courses/astro233/symp06/symp06.pdf astrobites.org/2012/02/15/and-now-theres-a-problem-with-m-dwarfs-too/ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henize_2-10 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Paradoxes news.softpedia/news/Dwarf-Galaxies-Can-House-Supermassive-Black-Holes-177092.shtml sciencedaily/releases/2013/09/130924141701.htm ras.org.uk/news-and-press/219-news-2012/2143-ukirt-discovers-impossible-binary-stars news.sciencemag.org/2010/09/primordial-magnetic-field-may-permeate-universe?rss=1 spitzer.caltech.edu/images/1699-ssc2006-22b-Brief-History-of-the-Universe spitzer.caltech.edu/images/5593-ssc2013-05a-Bubbles-Within-Bubbles-annotated- spitzer.caltech.edu/images/4938-sig12-002-Finding-Bubbles-in-the-Milky-Way spitzer.caltech.edu/images/4932-ssc2012-04a-Orion-s-Rainbow-of-Infrared-Light nytimes/2013/08/13/science/space/a-black-hole-mystery-wrapped-in-a-firewall-paradox.html?pagewanted=2&_r=2 miqel/space_photos_maps/galactic_info/galactic-central-black-hole-sun-party.html extremetech/extreme/163662-hubble-telescope-solves-the-mystery-of-600000-light-year-long-gas-stream en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravastar space/17596-most-magnetic-giant-star-discovered.html en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal sciencedaily/releases/2013/10/131009111111.htm sciencedaily/releases/2012/04/120411144326.htm repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/ETD-UT-2009-12-441/DE-GENNARO-DISSERTATION.pdf?sequence=2 forum.objectivismonline/index.php?showforum=43 cloudynights/ubbthreads/postlist.php/Cat/0/Board/science cosmoquest.org/forum/forum.php cosmologyathome.org/forum_thread.php?id=1026 onlinephilosophyclub/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=9317 thescienceforum/introductions/36138-hello-binary-black-holes-restore-entropy-universe.html#post428109 politicsforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=150443&p=14247889#p14247889 cs.astronomy/asy/general_discussion/f/27.aspx evcforum.net/Threads.php?control=tf&f=2 evolutionfairytale/forum//index.php?app=core&module=global§ion=register princeton.edu/physics/people/display_person.xml?netid=staggs&display=faculty cosmologyathome.org/forum_forum.php?id=11 meetup/Quantum-Physics-Meetup-Group/messages/boards/ forums.philosophyforums/philosophy-of-science/ onlinephilosophyclub/forums/viewforum.php?f=12 vixra.freeforums.org/physics-f3.html cloudynights/classifieds/showcat.php?cat=11 skynewsmagazine.proboards/index.cgi cosmologyathome.org/forum_forum.php?id=11 jshine.net/astronomy/dark_sky/ thunderbolts.info/wp/ arxiv.org/html/gr-qc/9911053v6/thermo.html springer/astronomy/book/978-4-431-54200-1 chandra.harvard.edu/ johnagowan.org/Susskind.html johnagowan.org/index.html https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0009/G1000145/002/Keppel100305.pdf scienceworld.wolfram/physics/HubbleConstant.html preposterousuniverse/blog/2013/04/24/cp-violation-and-the-informationanti-information-asymmetry/ amazon/Thomson-Reuters-5226-EndNote-x6/dp/B00006I02V/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1373139135&sr=8-1&keywords=endnote astrophysics.gsfc.nasa.gov/gravity/research/numrel.htm megafoundation.org/CTMU/Articles/Langan_CTMU_092902.pdf hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Relativ/veltran.html rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1854/1335.full mrelativity.net/RelEscapeVelocity/Relativistic%20Escape%20Velocity.htm hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hph.html science20/quantum_gravity/blog/news_gravitational_waves_and_dark_matter_aps_april_meeting_2013-109194 https://lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/lscdatagrid/resources/data/index.html ligo.org/magazine/LIGO-magazine-issue-2.pdf ligo-wa.caltech.edu/ admdbsrv.ligo.caltech.edu/roster/ligo_roster.htf imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/exhibit/lisa_exhibit.html lisascience.org/ mode.obspm.fr/IMG/pdf/mode2013_hello.pdf cgwa.phys.utb.edu/ einstein-online.info/spotlights/gravWav imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/index.html scitizen/cosmology/gravitational-waves-from-the-big-bang_a-8-354.html tapir.caltech.edu/~teviet/Waves/gwave_spectrum.html space/7156-lack-gravity-waves-puts-limits-exotic-cosmology-theories.html tetrahedral.blogspot/2011/07/gravitational-waves.html https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0006/P0900255/004/P0900255-v4BW.pdf universetoday/102011/hydrogen-clouds-discovered-between-andromeda-and-triangulum-galaxies/ saoastronews.wordpress/2011/11/04/highmetallicitydistantgalaxies/ beforeitsnews/space/2013/01/huge-supply-of-pristine-gas-around-modern-galaxies-found-2453122.html abc.net.au/science/articles/1999/11/29/69371.htm#.Ua53MJwsbAQ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Velocity_Clouds spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys230/lectures/ism_gas/ism_gas.html astronomy/en/News-Observing/News/2011/11/Found%20-%20pristine%20gas%20from%20the%20Big%20Bang.aspx tgdaily/space-features/59582-pristine-gas-from-early-universe-discovered ita.uni-heidelberg.de/research/klessen/current/pom/index.shtml?lang=en cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/~zirbel/ast9/handouts/Age-of-universe.PDF arxiv.org/abs/1302.0023 ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Sept04/Henry/Henry5.html arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0306130 thesis.library.caltech.edu/2007/1/thesis.pdf arxiv.org/pdf/1204.1073v1.pdf arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/9609196.pdf iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/566/2/993/pdf/0004-637X_566_2_993.pdf cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?74565-Evolution-of-Galaxies-amp-Metallicity youtube/watch?v=UE8yHySiJ4A spacetelescope.org/images/opo1103c/ ifa.hawaii.edu/research/Galaxies.shtml www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~bureau/early-types.html aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2009/35/aa11756-09/aa11756-09.html sciencedaily/releases/2010/11/101101161907.htm astro.wisc.edu/~flack/ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_J0348%2B0432 astrophysicsspectator/topics/degeneracy/NeutronStarSize.html news.discovery/space/why-are-quark-stars-so-strange.htm swift.gsfc.nasa.gov/results/publist/Ofek_ApJ_662_1129_2007.pdf redorbit/news/space/1112914997/smoking-gun-reaction-from-gamma-ray-burst-080413/ youtube/watch?v=80HkL3EF2tc jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh/insidebh/schw.html youtube/watch?v=cW7BvabYnn8 youtube/watch?v=ciWGrZMkXVM&feature=g-vrec bing/videos/search?q=black+hole&mid=E1F0CAAF50E7CBBD7803E1F0CAAF50E7CBBD7803&view=detail&FORM=VIRE7 wn/black_hole_entropy youtube/watch?v=eI9CvipHl_c physics.stackexchange/questions/20690/what-happens-to-information-when-black-holes-merge space/12790-monster-black-hole-cannibal-galaxy-collisions.html web.physics.ucsb.edu/~gary/BH,Entropy,Info.pdf space/533-surprising-black-hole-milky-center.html nyabingimanni.blogspot/2011/03/black-holes-entropy.html news.discovery/space/galaxies/black-hole-unleashes-supermassive-belch-130108.htm student.physics.ucdavis.edu/kiskis/phy9b_11/entropy_info.pdf black-holes.org/explore2.html https://youtube/watch?v=80HkL3EF2tc arstechnica/science/2013/02/strange-supernova-remnant-harbors-milky-ways-youngest-black-hole/ youtube/watch?v=p647WrQd684 news.nationalgeographic/news/2013/03/130301-black-hole-speed-of-light-einstein-science-astronomy-space/ nature/nature/journal/v494/n7438/full/nature11938.html thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/guests08/061108_sjcrothers.htm en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-hair_theorem math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/BlackHoles/hawking.html prac.us.edu.pl/%7Eztpce/QM/CMPhawking.pdf astronomycast/2007/01/episode-18-black-holes-big-and-small/ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Black_hole_information_paradox en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_system_of_units en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon_acoustic_oscillations en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_dwarf#cite_note-osln-1 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hubble_constant.JPG en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escape_velocity en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-sigma_relation en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_known_stars en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_black_hole en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_periodic_table en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degeneracy_pressure en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Gamow fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/ssc/data/ lifehack.org/articles/technology/beginners-guide-run-linux-like-any-other-program-in-windows.html virtualboximages/ScientificLinux+6.3+x86_64+Desktop+VirtualBox+Virtual+Appliance scientificlinuxforum.org/index.php?s=5c56b933ad5a1eec08058c6cdd398f51&showforum=16 linfo.org/command_line_lesson_1.html foxnews/science/2013/01/13/comet-2013-among-brightest-ever-seen/ foxnews/science/2013/02/22/scientists-search-for-unparticle/ hubblesite.org/gallery/ youtube/watch?v=kV33t8U6w28 youtube/watch?v=FpomfWEr5Dk foxnews/science/2013/03/27/whoa-mini-supernovas-discovered/ myhome.spu.edu/ddowning/astr/camp_casey_telescope.html cosmoquest.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?11-Astronomy https://youtube/watch?v=5vOU6-1yNZs scienceblogs/startswithabang/2012/07/18/how-big-is-the-entire-universe/ wired/wiredscience/2013/01/space-photo-of-the-day-2/?pid=7113 scribd/doc/9651782/NASA-SP2008565-Columbia-Crew-Survival-Investigation-Report-298870 sciencedaily/releases/2013/08/130807134508.htm hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2006/01/image/a/format/zoom/ youtube/watch?v=lMBt_yfGKpU en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Webb_Space_Telescope stardestroyer.net/Empire/Science/Relativity.html 1728.org/escvel.htm adorio-research.org/wordpress/?p=453 phys.org/news/2011-04-tycho-supernova-remnant-evidence-supernovas.html universe-galaxies-stars/archive_821.html en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SNR_0509-67.5 ing.iac.es/PR/SH/SH2004/tycho.html livescience/23583-brightest-star-explosion-lonely-supernovas.html 1728.org/reltivty.htm relativitycalculator/fundamental_constants.shtml relativitycalculator/index.shtml pnas.org/content/108/15/5938.full pleiades.physics.wsu.edu/users/ghosh/ghosh.htm#! amazon/Numerical-Relativity-Einsteins-Equations-Computer/dp/052151407X einstein.phys.uwm.edu/ sjcrothers.plasmaresources/index.html sjcrothers.plasmaresources/papers.html en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_(quantum_mechanics) theconversation/new-theory-of-general-relativity-casts-doubt-on-dark-matter-16446 theprovince/technology/space/Universe+expanding+after+research+suggests/8807717/story.html scientificamerican/article.cfm?id=is-gravity-a-particle-or astronomycast/about/ beforeitsnews/space/2012/09/new-approach-to-cosmic-lithium-in-the-early-universe-2445886.html news.sciencemag.org/space/2013/07/swirls-afterglow-big-bang-could-set-stage-major-discovery news.cnet/8301-17938_105-57599377-1/a-star-is-born-literally-and-its-stunning/ youtube/watch?v=083fSbguKh8 brucegary.net/ISON/ sci.esa.int/lisa/42592-mission-summary/ phys.org/news/2013-07-discoveries-planck-rethinking-universe-began.html#jCp phys.org/news/2013-03-planck-reveals-universe.html#inlRlv phys.org/news/2013-05-4c2930-black-hole-powered-jets.html#inlRlv sciencedaily/releases/2010/02/100217093251.htm sciencedaily/releases/2012/10/121003132117.htm sciencedaily/releases/2012/03/120327093608.htm sciencedaily/releases/2012/03/120327093608.htm sciencedaily/releases/2012/03/120323134800.htm sciencedaily/releases/2011/01/110109184020.htm sciencedaily/releases/2012/02/120215123945.htm sciencedaily/releases/2010/05/100510075523.htm swift.ac.uk/xrt_products/index.php eso.org/public/news/eso1242/ google/sky/ arstechnica/science/2013/08/the-milky-ways-black-hole-like-cookie-monster-loses-more-than-it-eats/ de-regt/Astronomy/RhoOphiuchi.htm © 2013 Jimmy Vick
Posted on: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 06:37:16 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015