DR MORAG KERR: LOCKERBIES SIR HUMPHREY On 20 October 2013, the blogger Dave described Dr Morag Kerrs call to follow the evidence (set out in the Lockerbie Official Narrative) as pure Sir Humphrey: John Ashton wrote: She (Dr Morag Kerr) is no daft conspiracy theorist, indeed before her involvement in the case she spent a lot of time taking on 9/11 conspiracists. Alas this is hardly an endorsement because taking on 9/11 conspiracists involves defending the official conspiracy theory that 2 planes destroyed 3 towers! Aka, supporting the Big Lie that 220 storeys (WT1 & 2) of reinforced concrete and steel disintegrated at free fall speed due to office fires and that another 49 storeys (WT7) fell in sympathy, at free fall speed, 5 hours later for reasons officially unknown! (Re.A&E9/11truth.org) Now I know people fear the truth for various reasons and therefore avoid looking, but why would someone spend time trying to dispute the laws of physics and on whose behalf? Equally Rolfe now defends the official conspiracy theory about Lockerbie that it was a Muslim IED/bomb! True not Megrahi’s conviction - that was debunked on the day it was delivered - but the original CIA false trail of a Syrian-backed Palestinian group funded by Iran. And Rolfe’s defence of the official bomb theory and official 9/11 conspiracy theory fit within the neo-con West Vs the Muslims narrative that is used to promote war in the Middle East and Homeland Security. That said, the two official conspiracy theories are in response to distinct events, but Rolfe’s call to look at the evidence is pure Sir Humphrey, because it implies that the evidence supports rather than debunks both official conspiracy theories. (wikispooks/wiki/Morag_Kerr#Pure_Sir_Humphrey)
Posted on: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:11:06 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015