DVLA Customer complaint Resolution Team D16 Longview Road Morriston Swansea SA6 7JL 290/05/2014 Dear Michelle Re. (licence number) Thank you for your recent correspondence dated ( ) correctly addressed to me Hannah the human man/woman. I did notice however, that you have directed the contents of your letter to my sole corporation (your all caps name. I understand that although you have addressed it correctly to me you have not written it to me…. Very clever ;) Since I am executive, administrator and beneficiary to said artificial person/ legal entity/ sole corporation (your name) I will be dealing with this matter. For the record though I am indeed Hannah, a real life woman and not a soulless fiction. With regards to the ‘points’ you made in reference to The road traffic act 1988 and the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994 I would like to confirm that I understand acts to be statutes and statutes are not laws. It is an established fact that statutes can only have the force of law with the consent of the governed and as I have evidenced in my claim of right I have in fact withdrawn consent to be represented and thus governed by any other human. Therefore these ‘laws’ as you call them have no effect on me as a free woman. I will however for and on the record rebut individually each of your ‘points’ [i] Legally speaking I am not a driver. Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition Driver. 1. A person who steers and propels a vehicle. 2. A person who herds animals; a drover. Black’s Law dictionary 4th Edition One Employed in conducting or operating a coach, carriage, wagon, or other vehicle, with horses, mules, or other animals, or a bicycle, tricycle, or motor car, though not a street railroad car. A person actually doing driving, whether employed by owner to drive or driving his own vehicle. Black’s Law dictionary 2nd Edition One Employed in conducting a coach, carriage, wagon or other vehicle, with horses, mules or other animals, or a bicycle, tricycle, or motor car, though not a street railroad car. Legally the word ‘driver’ clearly describes a PERSON employed in the act of operating a vehicle. Since I am not employed to operate my car as I am neither a taxi, nor a courier etc. I do not require a licence to exercise what is in fact a God given right to travel freely. I am not acting as an agent of government as I am acting as Hannah the ‘natural person’ The 9th edition definition of the word ‘driver’ is different from the earlier revisions of the word as the deception on society increased. I’m not here to school you but if you want to check out The word ‘person’ in Black’s law dictionary. You will see there is a well-established divide between two separate entities. One of the natural person (human being) and the other of an ‘artificial person’ the latter is created by government without full disclosure via the registration of our birth. The reason the word employed can be taken out of this ‘revised’ definition is because the definition of ‘person’ has also been revised. Legally a ‘person’ can be either of two entities. You are presuming I am a trustee to my sole corporation. I am informing you that I am in fact executive, administrator and beneficiary. The government is trustee. As a free man/woman I do not give permission for my legal name to be used as personal identification and thus I am not bound by your ‘laws’. I will for legal purposes in this matter define myself as a traveller which I define below from Black’s Law dictionary Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition Traveler. A person who passes from place to place, for any reason. [ii] With regards the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act I have made my position clear with regards to paying tax in my notarised notice of lawful tax rebellion. I understand that the people of this country have a lawful duty, under the laws of war, to refuse to pay tax if we believe our governments are using the money to fund the murder and genocide of innocent civilians abroad. Which I do very strongly believe to be the case. As my notice of tax rebellion is a notarised, closed document, I suggest you contact the queen or the archbishop directly if you wish to discuss this matter further. [iii] “ A citizen has the right to travel and to transport his property upon the public highways in the ordinary course of life and business. However, if one exercises the Right to Travel (without first giving up the Right and converting that Right into a privilege) the citizen is by STATUTE guilty of a crime. This amounts to converting the exercise of a Constitutional Right to a crime.” Recall the Miller vs U.S Unless you can provide proof of claim Michelle, that the DVLA or anybody actually can/do own the public roads then in implying that I would be breaking the law to travel with no license you are guilty of the following offences; deception, obstruction, perjury, and gross negligence equal to fraud. Whereas I understand a license to be a commercial contract. Whereby in the act of SUBMITTING an APPLICATION for a LICENSE you are in fact wilfully waiving a right. Ie. Right to travel. As I attempted to return to you in good faith my driver’s licence card for your disposal I shall instead be forced dispose of it myself. Moreover, be it now known that any actual or presumed contract between us is now rescinded. Respectfully I trust my letter has clarified you too. Namaste
Posted on: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:34:38 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015