Dear Peel Council, The EPA HQ Union of Scientists explains why it opposes fluoridation: ...an employee came to the union with a complaint: he said he was being forced to write into the regulation a statement to the effect that EPA thought it was alright for children to have funky teeth... ...dental fluorosis, but since it had deemed the effect as only cosmetic, EPA didnt have to set its health-based standard at a lower level to prevent it.... ...Since then our opposition to drinking water fluoridation has grown, based on the scientific literature documenting the increasingly out-of-control exposures to fluoride, the lack of benefit to dental health from ingestion of fluoride and the hazards to human health from such ingestion. These hazards include acute toxic hazard, such as to people with impaired kidney function, as well as chronic toxic hazards of gene mutations, cancer, reproductive effects, neurotoxicity, bone pathology and dental fluorosis. First, a review of recent neurotoxicity research results.... nteu280.org/Issues/Fluoride/NTEU280-Fluoride.htm Have a wonderful day!
Posted on: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:25:19 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015