Dear physicists, because you examine here scientific issues connecting to the nuclear particle researches, you must to be ready to answer in any questions which defend correctness of your work and there has nothing to do any yours own rules which disturb this your right. So I see that your work in these issues has significant frailty and you must to defend your work! So answer me again and please essentially only not administratively! About Nobel lecture of Englert and Higgs: I like somewhat the lecture of Higgs, because he pretty honestly realizes weak points of the so called BEH mechanism, which of course is totally wrong…. Why? let me explain: The polarization of the space it isn’t valid only about the electromagnetic interaction but also about the gravity… in fact the gravity polarization is the essentially explanation of the electromagnetic polarization, see the following, which was posted about Jupiter’s belts but fully applicable here: On pages 55, 56, 57 USM kanevuniverse is shown the essence of polarization of the space and the equation of that, which is universally about the all stable fields: gravitational, electromagnetic and nuclear and explain in very simple and convincing way behavior of strong and weak interactions. In particular it is explains the belts of Jupiter and Saturn and their approximately sizes. Most important conclusion is that these belts have relativistic velocity of birth, which leads to the conclusion that these two planets are the most dangerous place on the solar system. So the polarization of the space is creates by the field generally and the quantity difference between the gravity and electrostatic is consequence by the expansion of the universe (in fact our galaxy) see part I USM kanevuniverse .And respectively the magnetism is rotation mass inertial moment but with the new quantity, because of the same reason. Moreover the quantum mechanics can’t be useful about the essentially conclusion about the nature of the fields, because this theory is crated upon the wave representation of the world and observation of the energy rule of preservation only, why?… see part I USM where is given the essential equation of the universal field. So the electromagnetism is consequence of the gravity (because they are in fact the same field but with differently quantity sizes). So obviously it is impossible to exists scalar field without mass, even upon the rules of the electromagnetism. This was the first delusion of BEH, there must to add only the following: The problem of photon comes from this: The empty or absolute space doesn’t exist according to USM kanevuniverse because of the essence of creating the fields (all gravitation, electrostatic-magnetic and nuclear) and their interconnection regarding their quality essence and quantity sizes. So in the general relativity any where the velocity of light in vacuum must to replace with the velocity of light in empty space and because such empty space doesn’t exist, that is the main reason that such velocity can’t be reached. So obviously the photon can has mass in repose equal to zero only in empty space, which doesn’t exist in reality, then all real photons in fact are virtual photons (relativistic photons) which in low velocities, their masses inclined to zero, but they have some masses through interaction with the surrounding matter (the surrounding matter carry partially light ray – experiment of Fizau). This interaction is realizes by the electromagnetic field in accordance with the equations of Maxwell Lorentz and in accordance with the essence of the light ray shown in USM. So there spring up again the problem with the so called Higgs boson, namely: If this Higgs scalar field is indeed purely energy, then from what this energy is contains?…. from photons? But how we already see the photons have inertial interactions with the surrounding matter, therefore they have interaction masses in low velocities and significant masses (relativistic masses) in relativistic velocities (virtual photons). But the Higgs scalar field is purely energy (there it isn’t any masses), then from what is contain this purely energy, or simply such event cannot exist?! Velocity of light is different in different mediums but that difference is relatively small and generally the light ray is travels with the speed close to the speed of light but a little less than the speed of light in empty space. Relativistic case about the speed of light is appears when the surrounding matter interacting with the light ray is in relativistic state. Now let continue with most insolvent part of BEH and that is so called “condensation” of the scalar field into mass boson. There is suggests the analogy with the symmetry and disturb the symmetry in one another incorrect theory about superconductivity. I don’t stop to the problem that suggested by Higgs about quality and quantity difference with the relativistic nature of the BEH, because the superconductivity it isn’t result of electrons pairs like some kind of condensation, but another far more convince reasons (see superconductivity USM kanevuniverse ) . So explanation how the scalar field passes into mass dynamical vector particle is stupid and indeed is a full fog in the mind of the lecturer. Let pass into the experimental table of the CERN regarding BEH. First of all obtained there new particle which I call 126 boson has nothing to do with the so called Higgs scalar non mass field, because such field cannot exist as well as the big bang never happen…. Why? see Q&A USM kanevuniverse and many more…. G.Kanev According to the concept of big bang the Higgs field is purely energy without any masses (masses don’t exist yet!) So if this field indeed exist then how we can measure such phenomenon if we haven’t masses and therefore accelerations and forces…. How we can know that such thing called Higgs boson indeed exist… So obviously this conception it isn’t fit with the fundamental rules of the physics and I wonder how such conception can define by the physicist? This is naïve view over the universe. Moreover according to USM kanevuniverse energy and masses always are hand with hand.. it is impossible to exist one of them without the other…. In such way the described problem is avoidable and this is the right physical direction!
Posted on: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:18:44 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015