Deut 32:1 - in context, Moses is basically saying “Listen up, everyone!” Or do you think that Moses is saying, “Give ear, Covenant, and I will speak, and let the Temple hear the words of my mouth.”? What a traumatic change of language, simply to ignore the obvious. Moses speaks to Israel; he explains the same Song of Moses that is mentioned in Revelation. I purposely included Deuteronomy 31:30 to clearly demonstrate who was the recipient of Moses words; and in the very next verse, he addresses Heaven and Earth. To ignore the simple context of/in Deuteronomy 31:30 is simply to force something that is not there. Jeremiah and Isaiah likewise refer to Israel as Heaven and Earth As far as It not mattering if there is a temple? Or Sacrifices? Please review that which you proclaim as read in Matthew 5:17-18 You wish to recognize it mentions the law, yet you ignore the requirements of/under the law; a Temple, Altar, Sacrifices, Offerings and their accompanying Priesthood, are requirements under the Old Covenant Law & Prophets. Those 2 simple verses in Matthew 5 say that NONE of the Law & Prophets would pass before ALL were Fulfilled. You conveniently slice and dice the Priesthood and sacrifical system out but that plainly violates Christ words. There is a Temple, but its not one made of Brick & Mortar, or hands.............. That same chapter 32 of Deuteronomy also clarifies itself................ Verse 43: Rejoice, O ye nations, with his people: for he will avenge the blood of his servants, and will render vengeance to his adversaries, and will be merciful unto his land, and to his people. This verse is paramount to understanding the timing of where and when this avenging would occur. If you fast forward to Revelation 19:2 For true and righteous are his judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand. This is clearly the Fulfillment of that Prophecy in Deuteronomy 32:43. Next, please notice Matthew 23:35-36 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. The timing of this vengeance of righteous blood is further clarified by Christ in Luke 21:22 For these are the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. And we know this accompanies his Coming/Parousia which is mentioned in the Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24-25, Mark 13 and Luke 21) and is specifically stated that it would occur also in that generation earlier mentioned in Matthew 23:35-36 but is found specifically in Matthew 24:34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled. We likewise see this repeated in Mark 13:30 and Luke 21:32 There are more than 100 New Testament verses that say all this was to happen in the 1st century. The only arguments Ive seen you present to defend your view, is simply to repeat and stress what you believe; does an Atheist prove no God exists by simply and consistently repeating and stating their own opinions? You can Mock Fulfilled Eschatology all you wish; what you can not do is disprove it; especially by simply reminding us how dumb Fulfilled Eschatology is or seems to you. Go back and examine my verse chain......... youll notice I didnt change/alter or redefine anything. As for that Priesthood that use to exist under the Old Covenant? Are you prepared to deny Christ his Eternal Priesthood? The one that scripture so clearly says he already had? That Law system of/under the Old Covenant is likewise shown to be replaced. Heb 7:11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? Heb 7:12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law. Fulfilled Eschatology is simply irrefutable unless Futurist Eschatological presupposed ideal are eisegetically transposed into the scriptures. An infamous argument against Fulfillment is that we Spiritualize everything; the yet Futurist position can not be drawn from scripture without 1st, spiritualizing the overwhelming majority of audience relevance, timed statements and personal pronouns. I challenge anyone to (actually and factually) disprove the verse chain I have presented in this defense and explanation of Fulfillment.
Posted on: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:06:09 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015