EXPANDING LIFE WITH THE ENERGY NAMED MONEY By Fred - TopicsExpress



          

EXPANDING LIFE WITH THE ENERGY NAMED MONEY By Fred Andrews Custodial bankers have made it difficult for people to access their own money—and may have become too big to provide any real service to anyone, and that is a real daunting thought. I am not talking about putting a hundred dollars in the bank and paying $3 to get it back out. People called customers are now serving these sectarian banks that keep their sect secret: they call it being conservative. These are the bankers that print and distribute paper money in just about every country. Having this custodial network across the globe means that they are the ones that manipulate currency exchange and claim the lion’s share of the capital gains. The rational mind may think that this level of monopoly and control is satisfactory, but the custodial banker is sectarian, and wants it all for nothing. Consequently, I want the custodial bankers to have custody of all the paper money that they can handle, as long as the depositors can access their share-equity electronically. I have not monitored what they said, but if you begin to participate: that will be the most appropriate. I am proposing that you have access to $7,000 American-USD weekly, if you choose: that you can use to acquire your homes and buy the things that you use. Just know that this could bring out the best in your caring politicians that ALWAYS vow to fight for you! Now is the time to put the pugilists to the test, and see if they can agree to your being free! This word FIGHT seems to be the choice vernacular of the high and the mighty, and those who aspire to preside over the people, subjectivity. Bankers are less vocal and more pro-active than politicians, but they are not running for office, they are more conservative than that…”they prefer to run the office!” In the old paradigm—meaning—a time when people were confined to one reality with no visual perception of a virtual reality: The energy called money was very forcefully restrained by mortgage, and required the pledge of a slave, which was the prime capital property of the high and the mighty. If the borrowers were too liberal to own slaves, then they could pledge a kin, and usually did. Borrowers did not always keep their pledges then—just as now—because of circumstances beyond their control: To prevent an incurrence of betrayal, the slave trader vows to fight for the release of the pledged slave. In the evolution process from the old to the new paradigm, the mortgager seizes pledged property, and mortally injures the slaves economically, as punishment for a broken pledge. Please bear in mind that punishment is only befitting payment for the commission of crime. When you borrow without a guarantee, you are committing crime. Punishment cannot be arbitrary, and it has to fit the crime. To dehumanize a person by taking away his/her home, and destroying the probability of that person getting another home, as punishment for a broken pledge is an act of terrorism. Log on to bargainhuntersplus and leave a comment, or tell me what you want to do!
Posted on: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:50:20 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015