East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (III of - TopicsExpress



          

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (III of 1949) Section 13-B, 15, 18-A – NRI Landlord -- Leave to contest -- Respondent had denied the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties -- Triable issue arises in this case -- Lease agreement has not been executed by the petitioner -- Rent Controller had, thus, rightly granted leave to contest the ejectment petition. Harkirat Kaur v. Harvinder Singh and others, 2014(2) L.A.R. 111 (P&H). Section 13-B, 15, 18-A – NRI Landlord -- Leave to contest -- Case of the petitioner is that he was the sole owner of the property in question for the last more than five years prior to the filing of the petition whereas the case of the respondent was that the property in question was owned by “A” and She had rented out the premises to the respondent and “A” had died – Triable issues arise as to when and how the petitioner became the owner of the property in question -- Rent Controller had rightly granted leave to contest the ejectment petition. Yashpal Singh v. Vishrat Kumar, 2014(2) L.A.R. 112 (P&H). Section 13-B, 15, 18-A – NRI Landlord -- Leave to contest -- Triable issue arises as to whether their exists the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties -- Rent Controller had rightly allowed leave to contest the ejectment petitioner. Kultar Singh Jogi v. Ranjit Singh and another, 2014(2) L.A.R. 114 (P&H). New Garg Law House 9417415528
Posted on: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 05:44:53 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015