Environmental Democrat columnist Karl Grossman is at it again. - TopicsExpress



          

Environmental Democrat columnist Karl Grossman is at it again. This time using the power of his pen to roll out the latest leftist brainchild concept: Being anti-science and then proceeding to brand that scarlet letter label on to Lee Zeldin, the Republican Congressional contender to the card-carrying pro-science incumbent, Democrat Congressman Tim Bishop. Although truthfully, Im not quite sure what anti-science really is. Something tells me that it cant be a good thing and that all self-respecting citizens should avoid that anti-science label at all costs. Why is Lee Zeldin an anti-science bigot? Because he is a denier! Yes, a climate-change denier! Had Mr. Zeldin lived in the middle ages, he would have been sentenced to burn at the stake for such blasphemy, for surely it was a sign of the devil. At the time, a consensus of scientists could have told you that for sure. In case you didnt get the memo, climate change is caused by men and women including LGBT, as established science. It is true because a consensus of 97% of climate scientists whose paycheck depends on linking global warming to human activity over the last half century, say it is so. It is so because leftist columnist Karl Grossman simply regurgitates those same talking points. Who knew that our planet, that went on living peacefully for some 4,500,000,000 years (thats 4.5 billion years), could be suddenly sent into an irrecoverable spiral of destruction by 50 years of human technological activityand bovine over-flatulence? Im not a scientist or a mathematician, but common sense tells me that taking a 50 year sample to draw scientific conclusions of our 4.5 billion year-old mother earth is probably not very statistically relevant, nor close to accurate. I doubt that pollsters, scientists or statisticians could accurately tell you whether 300 million Americans are overweight or not, using a survey sample of just 50 people. Nevertheless, a self-proclaimed consensus of what is actually political scientists and agenda-driven columnists have no problem intimidating us into believing that we come-along-lately-humans have so misbehaved over last 50 years that it is killing a 4.5 billion year-old planet! The sad truth is that genuine environmental protection is good common sense, but it has been hijacked by the politically correct agenda-driven green movement. And the real science behind being green is the art of redistributing your wealth in the guise of averting a coming apocalypse foretold by political prophets: there is a 75 per cent chance that [the entire north pole could be ice free]… The ice cap is falling off a cliff. It could be completely gone in as little as seven years from now (2014).– Al Gore 2007 Note: Actually this week, an inconvenient fact was published. Satellite photos show the North Pole with record ice, 1.7 million square km. more than two years ago, despite Al Gores prediction that it would be ice free by now – UK Daily Mail, Aug 30, 2014. As for Republican Lee Zeldin being accused of anti-scientism, I can only attest that as a our current NY State Senator in Albany, he is a clear-thinking, common sense individual who doesnt sheepishly follow politically expedient group think. In fact recently, he was the only Republican to vote against the all important yogurt bill, proposing yogurt to be the official state snack.” Yes, he denied us the right to call ourselves New York, the Yogurt State, not because he is anti-yogurt, but perhaps because there are a whole lot more pressing issues for elected officials than debating yogurt. So, Mr. Grossman, one might want to focus more on… you know, things like, the problem of beheading fellow journalists, preventing ISIS from coming across the border, or simply perhaps writing about genuine environmental protection, without tying it to your political agenda. Jacques Ditte
Posted on: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 16:38:17 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015