Fawaaz Al-Madkhaliyy presented this: A WONDROUS NARRATIVE ON - TopicsExpress



          

Fawaaz Al-Madkhaliyy presented this: A WONDROUS NARRATIVE ON THE CLEVERNESS OF THE SCHOLARS. Shaykhul Islaam (Ibn Taymiyyah) said; LIKE THE POPULAR EVENT WELL KNOWN, REGARDING QAADII ABUUBAKR IBNUT TAYYIB, WHEN THE MUSLIMS SENT HIM TO THE KING OF CHRISTIANS IN CONSTANTINOPLE, THEY GRATIFIED HIM (THEIR KING) AND THE CHRISTIANS KNEW HOW MUCH THEY HONOUR HIM. THEY FEARED THAT HE (QAADII ABUUBAKR) MAY NOT PROSTRATE TO THE KING WHEN HE FINALLY ENTER. SO THEY THEY MADE HIM ENTER FROM A SMALL MINUTE DOOR, SO THAT HE COULD ENTER WHY STILL BENDING TO GREET THE KING. HE (QAADII) UNDERSTOOD AND REASONED THEIR PLOT. SO HE ENTERED BACKING THEM AND HE ENTERED WHILE MEETING THEM BY HIS BACKSIDE. (as a dishonour), HE DID THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THEY WHAT THEY PLANNED. WHEN HE SAT DOWN AND THEY SPOKE WITH HIM, SOME OF THEM WANTED TO SLANDER/SAY BAD THINGS AGAINST THE MUSLIMS, SO THEY SAY; WHAT IS IT THAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT AAISHAH, THE WIFE OF YOUR PROPHET? (They wanted to come with the false allegations levied against Aaishah, which the Raafidah Shiites do believe and those like them). The Qaadii said: There are two women (in history), who were slandered and accused of zina, which are lies and false, the two are Maryam and Aaishah. As for Maryam, she came with a child and without a husband. As for Aaishah, she came not with a child even when she has a husband. The Christians were astonished/flabbergasted/short of words. From the context, what the Qaadii means is to point out that the innocence of Aaishah is more of greatness and clarity than that of Maryam, and to give the instance of Maryam is more of mentioning than that of Aaishah. If with all these, the falseness of those who slandered Maryam is clear, then the clarity of of the falseness of the liars against Aaishah precedes. Reference: Minhaajus-Sunnah part 2, pages 52-57 Translated by: Abubakar Ozemoya Irekpita Yusuf This is the English meaning of my previous post. Who can help to translate to Latin and French? And if possible Hebrew.
Posted on: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:54:21 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015