Feeing for my family right now who have been to hell and back and will carry the scars for life of the betrayal and disgusting behaviour of someone they trusted and loved. My heart aches and I wish I was closer to be there with them. Do you think if the victims do not want name suppression, if they prefer people know who it is, so that others can be spared the same fate (because it is clear he is not accepting he did anything wrong - he drove to the court because he thought hed get off with home detention) that the perpetrator should be protected with name suppression? This is not about anger and vengeance, it is more about protecting the innocent and ensuring no-one has to suffer being duped by him in the future. It is about naming and shamming someone into reality and making sure the disease of Voyerism is exposed for what it is, rather than for what it isnt. I dont know much about name suppression and how it can be lifted after sentencing but it would sure help my family move on knowing they have done everything they can to keep others safe. nzherald.co.nz/crime/news/article.cfm?c_id=30&objectid=11370588
Posted on: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:21:23 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015