For his part, Cruz went the extra mile in his effort to thwart Power’s appointment, issuing a strongly worded warning to citizens and colleagues that Power’s record evinced that she would surrender U.S. sovereignty to the globalist bureaucrats at the UN. Wrote Cruz: Today I voted to oppose the nomination of Samantha Power to be Ambassador to the United Nations. My opposition to her nomination comes down to one word: sovereignty. I have seen firsthand how treaties and conventions negotiated at the United Nations and elsewhere can have unintended consequences for the United States when I represented Texas before the US Supreme Court in successfully arguing that no President has the authority to force a state to comply with an order from the United Nations and the International Court of Justice. Samantha Power’s positions on the United Nations suggest she agrees with President Obama in giving the United Nations authority over fundamental rights, such as our right to bear arms, and in allowing US taxpayer dollars to be used at the UN to undermine our ally, Israel. In 2003, she wrote that “giving up a pinch of sovereignty” to organizations such as the UN is good for the United States and our security. There is no higher national security principle than defending American sovereignty, especially at the United Nations, where it has been demonstrated time and time again that when it comes to authority over the United States, when you give the UN a pinch, they will take a mile. As is so often the case, Cruz’s criticism is spot-on. Despite Power’s maddening (and perhaps treasonous) agenda, the United Nations poses an even greater and more immediate threat to the perpetuation of freedom in the United States. Read more at MinutemenNews/2013/08/new-u-s-ambassador-to-un-u-s-should-give-up-a-pinch-of-sovereignty/#hzZuit7cUsY5CQsi.99
Posted on: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 02:46:39 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015