For me, humour should be about subverting the hilarious cultural, social and economic advantages given to the unworthy privileged/esteemed. Gullivers Travels, a book, does this, as an example from 300 years ago. Frankie Boyle does it with jokes about Wayne Rooney. How did he get married, is it because I do sounds a bit like ooh ooh. There is a lot of counter-revolutionary culture (mainly Simon Cowell) and humour like Graham Norton, Ricky Gervais who make jokes out of people being weak by those self-same priggish culturally-orthodox standards. John Prescott, hes fat and working class and a politician. Hahaha. Entirely missing the point of the usual subversion in comedy. On Dealers and Delboys I have heard about a big pair of trousers what are you going to use that as... a tent? hahaha (a man being fat = funny why/how? other than by the non-thinking reactions of orthodox snobbishness by concensus-droids) and also Im in France, I cant speak French... then later I cant understand a bloody word hahaha again non-humureuse: is a lack of learning/understanding commitment of lazy British who then think it is somehow even surprising let alone funny that some French people speak only French. What world do they live in of viewpoint from this lazy passive annihilation of themselves by watching television and being dictated to by Amazon and Yahoo and being faux-celebrities on Twitter and their sodding mobile phones. Worst example is Michael McIntyre: there is nothing subversive about him in the slightest, his best joke is is hair, hes not in any sense a comedian or funny because what the people who think is funny about him is not funny, its a non-thinking passive acceptance of social conformity like a tedious sheep-person!
Posted on: Wed, 28 May 2014 20:54:56 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015