For public recorded The agent in charge of this Constitutional law born rights assaults on my life liberty and happiness Please in Jesus Name I need this Viral and please call them both I need everyone calling I Enjoy living ,,They both have the crime charges that I have filed,, This is the way Your Oregon Elected and public servants the employees under title 5 usc 2906-3331-3333 treats the disabled and elderly.. Senator Arnie Roblan Home Page - Oregon Legislature Home oregonlegislature.gov/roblan Cached Senator Arnie Roblan Democrat - District 5 - Coos Bay. Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705 Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97...301 Email: Sen ...Dont forget the Governor and Denis Richardson.. All have the files.. On our born rights life is a true learning life lesson when do you Honor thy mother and father ,when do we honor thy oath of office,5usc2906-3331-333.title 18 241 - 242 title 6 title 17,, when do you stop bickering ..peace and god bless Jesus,,An U.S All lawful Americans We are a republic,, Please in Jesus Name I need this Viral and please call them both I need everyone calling I Enjoy living ,,Senator Arnie Roblan Democrat - District 5 - Coos Bay. Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705 Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301 Email: Sen ...,,,,,.... David Gomberg for Oregon House electgomberg Cached Elect David Gomberg to the Oregon House of Representatives. Over the past 25 years my wife Susan and I have built a thriving small business. I wont we the people too know our Constitutionals and commercial code born rights, As Oregon Law states.. Amends and peace and god bless Jesus.. Its Jesus JESUS JES__US JES++USA Get it yet If anything happens to me State Senator Arnie Roblan 05/13/2013 youtube/watch?v=4i_3XWfkZ2g Harassment on our way to City of Toledo Oregon Council Meeting Part 1 Harassment on our way to City of Toledo Oregon Council Meeting Part 2 by Laura Walker 6,118 views Further harassment from City of Toledo Chief of Police David Enyeart ,,youtube/watch?v=HTXTZOI8Oqg Thumbnail Watch Later Harassment on our way to City of Toledo Oregon Council Meeting Part 4 05/15/2013 by Laura Walker 4,589 views Thumbnail6:37 Watch Later 1st and 5th Amendment Violated at Toledo Oregon Council Meeting by Laura Walker 5,377 views David Gomberg for Oregon House electgomberg Cached Elect David Gomberg to the Oregon House of Representatives. Over the past 25 years my wife Susan and I have built a thriving small business. Republic Vs Democracy videos . Search results Republic vs Democracy - YouTube youtube/watch?v=KFXuGIpsdE0 Cached Our system of government was never intended to be a democracy. Although many believe that we live in one, they have never been asked to vote on the ... . Play Video . Republic vs. Democracy - What Is The Real Form of the U.S ... youtube/watch?v=JdS6fyUIklI Cached NOTE: This video may be reproduced for non-profit, educational purposes ONLY. FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material ... . Play Video . Democracy vs Republic - Difference and Comparison | Diffen diffen/difference/Democracy_vs_Republic Cached Whats the difference between Democracy and Republic? The key difference between a democracy and a republic lies in the limits placed on government by the law, which ... Republic vs Democracy - Video Dailymotion dailymotion/video/xw6t1u_republic-vs-democracy_news Cached Watch the video «Republic vs Democracy» uploaded by Asif Ameer on Dailymotion By Oregon Trackers about time after years preaching about tis some are finally listing, Remember never ever have elected and public servants attended its is we the people, Not the Devils democracy No more, time too reclaim your republic a , Peoples Overs...ight Commission Election Night Stevens County Washington,, My Statement It s should be named the elected and public servant Oversight committees or commissions Too protect Lawful Americans First... are lawful American servant that are claiming public employment,, Never ever privatize yours and are freedom highways byways, walkways water ways, Get your freedom YET , Oversights Commissions,, Not foreign agents youtube/watch?v=9xx1Ps1fuJc&feature=youtu.be by oregontrackers Arights reserved title 18 My boy Nickolas Wildstar giving the Truth to these treasonous Nazi British Crown puppets and not one constitutional merit or lawful response was given..EXPOSED yet again! Time to slap eviction notices on their doorsteps from WE The People Lawful 1866 Computational treaty with the British Governor Wildstar EXPLODES In Court! Just another dayyoutube/watch?v=CJhihr_ynkE&feature=share in court with Governor Wildstar ;}- PLEASE spread this video around so more people will become aware of the corrupt justice system that exis... information within this site is content from U.S. sources. Citizens Rule Book - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_Rule_Book Cached Contents| Distribution| Notable events| References Citizens Rule Book is a handbook written to educate American citizens regarding their rights and responsibilities. It is a compilation of quotes from founders of the ... . Citizens Rule Book - Patriot Network patriotnetwork.info/Citizens_rule_book.htm Cached Rights Come From God, Not The State! You have rights that antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or retrained by human laws; rights ... Meet Your Strawman! - YouTube youtube/watch?v=ME7K6P7hlko Cached The story of how everyone has a strawman created for them at birth and how it is used to collect revenue for your government. A fun and informative ... Play Video Banks Know About Your Strawman (Heres Some Proof) - YouTube youtube/watch?v=ME7K6P7hlko Is the NAME on your Bank Statement or Account Really You? I beg to differ! youtube/watch?v=FRQYSnSBRs8 Redemption Of Your Strawman Account! Filing a UCC1 With The ... reality-bytes.hubpages/hub/Redemption-Of-Your-Strawman Cached Redemption Of Your Strawman Account! Filing a UCC1 With The Treasury Department? Is There A Treasury Bond In My Name? Strawman? UCC-1 Has anyone tried this and is it TRUE? | Peace ... dailypaul/45521 Cached When you own your STRAWMAN and anyone ... more like even when your right your wrong..know what I mean..At that ... an account is created based ... Judge Dale (retired) – The Great American Adventure Secrets ... lucas2012infos.wordpress/2012/05/25/judge-dale... Cached Judge Dale (retired) – The Great American Adventure Secrets Of America (Part 1 – 5) – 25 May 2012 I UV | Judge Dale: The Sovereign Citizen i-uv/judge-dale-the-sovereign-citizen Cached THE SOVEREIGN CITIZEN by: Judge Dale, retired Our federal government has instructed our federal, state and local police agencies that everyone who purports to be a ... Judge Dale, Retd ~ How To Defeat Admiralty Courts And The ... shiftfrequency/judge-dale-retd-admiralty-courts... Cached 7 thoughts on “ Judge Dale, Ret’d ~ How To Defeat Admiralty Courts And “The Law Of The See” ” sidney May 17, 2013 at 9:27 am. I have the same questions Could the War Powers Act be void on its face? Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866), ending any presumption that Lincoln had made us all inferior citizens. The holding in Milligan = The Constitution was not suspended in time of emergency. The Constitution was a law for rulers and people, equally in time of war and peace; therefore, the military trial of civilians which violated constitutional guarantees of indictment by grand jury and public trial by an impartial jury was impermissible where the civil courts remained open. Neither the president nor Congress can authorize the trial of civilians by military commission as long as the civil courts were open. In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992), Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government governed and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights. JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA WENT ON TO SAY: (in U.S v. Williams) “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right”. United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977) (quoting Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S.App. D.C. 58, 70, n. 54, 487 F.2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825, 98 S.Ct. 72, 54 L.Ed.2d 83 (1977).; United States v. John H. Williams, Jr.; 112 S.Ct. 1735; 504 U.S. 36; 118 L.Ed.2d 352; No. 90-1972. All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void [Marbury v. Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 180] “There can be no limitation on the power of the people of the United States (of America). By their authority the State Constitutions were made and by their authority the Constitution for the United States (of America) was established...” Hauenstein vs. Lynham (100 US 483). “The United States Supreme Court declares that the “Sovereignty” remains with the “people” and resides with the “people”...Yick Wo vs. Hopkins and Woo Lee Hopkins (118 US 356). “No action can be taken against a sovereign in the non-constitutional courts of either the United states or the state courts and any such action is considered the crime of Barratry1. Barratry is an offense at common law.” State vs. Batson 17 S.E.2d 511. 512,513. 1 BARRETOR. In criminal law. A common mover, exciter, or maintainer of suits and quarrels either in courts or elsewhere in the country; a disturber of the peace who spreads false rumors and calumnies, whereby discord and disquiet may grow among neighbors. Co.Litt. 368. One who frequently excites and stirs up groundless suits and quarrels, either at law or otherwise. Mate v. Batson, 220 N.C. 411, 17 S.E.2d 511, 512, 513. BARRETRY. In criminal law. The act or offense of a barretor, (q. v. usually called common barretry. 4 Steph.Comm. 262.  Status quo - Common people are not capable of making such decisions: (No supporting authorities offered) REBUTTAL – “Whenever people are well-informed they can be trusted with their own government” - Thomas Jefferson ... “The constitutions of most of our states assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent” - Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Cartwright; June 5, 1824; Trust in the jury is, after all, one of the cornerstones of our entire criminal jurisprudence, and if that trust is without foundation we must re- examine a great deal more than just the nullification doctrine. - Judge David L. Bazelon Status quo - Legal experts say that in 1946, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure were established, doing away with the common law grand jury model. (No supporting authorities offered) REBUTTAL – “The power of grand juries to inquire into the wilful misconduct in office of public officers, and to find indictments or to direct the filing of information’s in connection with such inquiries, shall never be suspended or impaired by law.” New York Constitution Article 1 §6 Status quo - Grand juries must be approved by the courts. REBUTTAL – “The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such supervisory judicial authority exists” - 1990, U.S v. Williams JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA SAID: “In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”. Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212, 218, 80 S.Ct. 270, 273, 4 L.Ed.2d 252 (1960); Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 61, 26 S.Ct. 370, 373, 50 L.Ed. 652 (1906); United States v. John H. Williams, Jr.; 112 S.Ct. 1735; 504 U.S. 36; 118 L.Ed.2d 352; No. 90-1972. “The Court of Appeals rule would neither preserve nor enhance the traditional functioning of the grand jury that the common law of the Fifth Amendment demands” - 1990, U.S v. Williams  Status quo - There is no statute or procedural rule that allows citizens to convene grand juries. (No supporting authorities offered) REBUTTAL – There is no statute or procedural rule that prevents people from convening grand juries. JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA SAID: “The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation,” see Hale, supra, 201 U.S., at 59-60, 65, 26 S.Ct., at 373, 375, ).; United States v. John H. Williams, Jr.; 112 S.Ct. 1735; 504 U.S. 36; 118 L.Ed.2d 352; No. 90-1972. “The grand jurys functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised. Unlike [a] [c]ourt, whose jurisdiction is predicated upon a specific case or controversy, the grand jury can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not. United States v. R. Enterprises, 498 U.S. ----, ---- , 111 S.Ct. 722, 726, 112 L.Ed.2d 795 (1991) (quoting United States v. Morton Salt Co., 338 U.S. 632, 642-643, 70 S.Ct. 357, 364, 94 L.Ed. 401 (1950)). Blair v. United States, 250 U.S. 273, 282, 39 S.Ct. 468, 471, 63 L.Ed. 979 (1919).; United States v. John H. Williams, Jr.; 112 S.Ct. 1735; 504 U.S. 36; 118 L.Ed.2d 352; No. 90-1972. Status quo - Unless common law grand juries are officially recognized by the courts, prosecutors offered presentments or individuals subpoenaed by the self-formed grand juries would not be legally compelled to cooperate. (No supporting authorities offered) REBUTTAL – Prosecutors are not offered presentments; presentments are filed with the Supreme Court Chief Clerk and once filed cannot be removed, anyone interfering with an official proceeding commits a crime under US codes. USC 18 §2076 - Clerk is to file: Whoever, being a clerk willfully refuses or neglects to make or forward any report, certificate, statement, or document as required by law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. USC 18 §2071 - Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, documents filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court, shall be fined or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. 18 USC §1512b - Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to - (1) influence, delay, or prevent ... an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to - (a) withhold ... a document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (b) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an official proceeding; ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. THE FOX & THE HEN HOUSE If the government can select the jurors [like they do now], it will, of course, select those whom it supposes will be favorable to its enactments [like they do now]. And an exclusion of any of the freemen from eligibility is a selection of those not excluded [like they do now]. It will be seen, from the statutes cited, that the most absolute authority over the jury box that is, over the right of the people to sit in juries has been usurped by the government; Lysander Spooner, Trial by Jury, page 92, 1852 “Men must be governed by God or they will be ruled by tyrants”. William Penn Amendment V – “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury...” It is in effect a fourth branch of government governed and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people. ...the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the fact. New York Constitution Article 1. §8 “As understood at common law and as used in constitutional provision, jury imports body of twelve men.” [State v. Dalton, 206 N.C. 507, 174 S.E. 422, 424; People ex rel.Cooley v. Wilder, 255 N.Y.S. 218, 222, 234 App.Div. 256; Hall v. Brown, 129 Kan. 859, 284 P. 396.] The jury has a unalienable right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy. John Jay, 1st Chief Justice United States Supreme Court, 1789. The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts. Samuel Chase, U.S. Supreme Court Justice 1796, Signer of the unanimous Declaration The jury has the power to bring a verdict in the teeth of both law and fact. Oliver Wendell Holmes, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1902.
Posted on: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:48:16 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015